6 sec in total
928 ms
4 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Telappliant content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about telappliant.com
We are a business services provider of managed IT, telecoms, connectivity and cybersecurity solutions to UK-based private and public sector organisations.
Visit telappliant.comWe analyzed Telappliant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 928 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
telappliant.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
14/100
10%
Value17.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
9/100
10%
Value7,090 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value18.8 s
3/100
10%
928 ms
109 ms
266 ms
333 ms
304 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Telappliant.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to B38c3e50aca114dbe4df-f986dd510b5fe49c4f7a928a947219d7.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (928 ms) belongs to the original domain Telappliant.com.
Page size can be reduced by 243.6 kB (44%)
548.6 kB
305.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Telappliant.com main page is 548.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 237.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 200.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 920 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Telappliant needs image optimization as it can save up to 920 B or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 33.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Telappliant.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.8 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 90 (95%)
95
5
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Telappliant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
telappliant.com
928 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
109 ms
style.css
266 ms
style.css
333 ms
style.css
304 ms
style.css
305 ms
style.css
301 ms
dashicons.min.css
334 ms
frontend-css.css
376 ms
frontend-css.css
378 ms
frontend-css.css
379 ms
frontend-css.css
379 ms
splide-css.css
386 ms
frontend-css.css
408 ms
frontend-css.css
452 ms
frontend-css.css
456 ms
frontend-css.css
454 ms
frontend-css.css
458 ms
frontend-css.css
470 ms
frontend-css.css
485 ms
frontend-css.css
529 ms
frontend-css.css
533 ms
frontend-css.css
534 ms
frontend-css.css
535 ms
frontend-css.css
546 ms
frontend-css.css
563 ms
theme.css
606 ms
style.css
690 ms
style.css
759 ms
style.css
613 ms
style.css
623 ms
style.css
641 ms
style.min.css
819 ms
font-awesome.min.css
783 ms
pns.css
211 ms
css2
194 ms
js
200 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
186 ms
js
221 ms
markerclustererplus@4.0.1.min.js
286 ms
api.js
198 ms
fonts.css
777 ms
telappliant-styles.css
722 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
565 ms
frontend-css.css
528 ms
frontend-css.css
566 ms
font-awesome.css
544 ms
wpforms-base.min.css
545 ms
jquery.min.js
607 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
533 ms
service-facebook-pixel.js
495 ms
google-analytics.js
500 ms
cookie-list.js
509 ms
shortcode-block-cookie.js
660 ms
view.min.js
792 ms
cookie-popup.js
769 ms
jquery.base64.min.js
726 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
724 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
724 ms
index.min.js
722 ms
index.min.js
708 ms
frontend-js.min.js
695 ms
frontend-js.min.js
652 ms
micromodal-js.min.js
648 ms
frontend-js.min.js
686 ms
splide-js.min.js
686 ms
frontend-js.min.js
673 ms
frontend-js.min.js
655 ms
frontend-js.min.js
609 ms
frontend-js.min.js
605 ms
script.min.js
803 ms
smush-lazy-load-native.min.js
776 ms
lodash.min.js
824 ms
rank-math-local.js
674 ms
snapengage.js
625 ms
wp-embed.min.js
624 ms
frontend-js.min.js
700 ms
frontend-js.min.js
711 ms
wpforms.min.js
708 ms
wpforms-conditional-logic-fields.min.js
671 ms
text-limit.min.js
668 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
670 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
671 ms
mailcheck.min.js
856 ms
punycode.min.js
880 ms
analytics.js
190 ms
hotjar-3029764.js
238 ms
3267C8_2_0.woff
560 ms
3267C8_1_0.woff
692 ms
3267C8_0_0.woff
565 ms
3267C8_3_0.woff
559 ms
diffuser.js
266 ms
modules.5cffd253af12af6303c3.js
89 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
482 ms
fa-light-300.woff
363 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
362 ms
telappliant.woff
225 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
359 ms
gen_204
83 ms
4e20c1b3-daf8-404b-98a4-f43169ba3213.js
207 ms
recaptcha__en.js
195 ms
prism.app-us1.com
256 ms
1594895650412.png
204 ms
box-1ada912494ba7fc7aca15fcef1c2a7ae.html
91 ms
ServiceGetConfig
187 ms
Hind-Regular.woff
158 ms
Montserrat-Bold.woff
171 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
269 ms
Montserrat-SemiBold.woff
318 ms
telappliant.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
telappliant.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
telappliant.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Telappliant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Telappliant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
telappliant.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: