7.3 sec in total
331 ms
4.8 sec
2.1 sec
Welcome to teologoresponde.org homepage info - get ready to check Teologo Responde best content for Colombia right away, or after learning these important things about teologoresponde.org
Encuentre la respuesta a distintas consultas sobre teología. A cargo del Padre Miguel Angel Fuentes, IVE
Visit teologoresponde.orgWe analyzed Teologoresponde.org page load time and found that the first response time was 331 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
teologoresponde.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.082
94/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
331 ms
80 ms
140 ms
292 ms
304 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Teologoresponde.org, 22% (17 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 14% (11 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (772 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 264.9 kB (17%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Teologoresponde.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Teologo Responde images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 163.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Teologoresponde.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163.2 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (58%)
66
28
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Teologo Responde. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.teologoresponde.org
331 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
80 ms
style.css
140 ms
style.min.css
292 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
304 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
319 ms
style.css
138 ms
style.min.css
192 ms
style.min.css
191 ms
wpp.css
227 ms
bootstrap.min.css
192 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
226 ms
css
174 ms
style.css
221 ms
style.css
278 ms
dashicons.min.css
279 ms
wp-pointer.min.css
275 ms
jetpack.css
280 ms
jquery.min.js
357 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
392 ms
general.js
259 ms
wpp.min.js
260 ms
bootstrap.min.js
260 ms
functions.js
260 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
169 ms
photon.min.js
634 ms
iframe-height-adjuster.min.js
254 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.min.js
256 ms
facebook-embed.min.js
632 ms
core.min.js
635 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
635 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
635 ms
hooks.min.js
636 ms
i18n.min.js
636 ms
wp-pointer.min.js
633 ms
pointer-tooltip.min.js
642 ms
product-tooltip.min.js
638 ms
product-image-preview.min.js
642 ms
e-202239.js
345 ms
diu.jpeg
584 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
740 ms
bannersup1.jpg
581 ms
5367-featured-45x45.jpg
442 ms
743-featured-45x45.jpg
444 ms
6965-featured-45x45.jpg
440 ms
276-featured-45x45.jpg
442 ms
106-featured-45x45.jpg
443 ms
78-featured-45x45.jpg
575 ms
285-featured-45x45.jpg
575 ms
650-featured-45x45.jpg
572 ms
274-featured-45x45.jpg
573 ms
525-featured-45x45.jpg
573 ms
853-featured-45x45.gif
601 ms
855-featured-45x45.jpg
566 ms
pixel.gif
639 ms
Te%C3%B3logo-responde-reducida.png
772 ms
web3-genealogy-ancestors-pictures-old-antique-shutterstock_124721416-by-vladimir-volodin-ai.jpg
557 ms
Camino-a-Ema%C3%BAs.jpg
541 ms
sacerdote.jpg
539 ms
trasplantes.jpg
454 ms
helping-climb.jpg
710 ms
adicto.jpg
562 ms
BLOG.jpg
714 ms
adiccion.jpg
712 ms
escribenos.jpg
713 ms
sdk.js
217 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
167 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
265 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
338 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rl.woff
340 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rl.woff
337 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rl.woff
339 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
338 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
262 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexg.woff
336 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
331 ms
sdk.js
255 ms
teologoresponde.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
teologoresponde.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
teologoresponde.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Teologoresponde.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Teologoresponde.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
teologoresponde.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Teologo Responde. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: