3.9 sec in total
526 ms
3.2 sec
220 ms
Visit teracom.cc now to see the best up-to-date Teracom content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about teracom.cc
Intuitive remote monitoring and control. The right choice for your remote automation challenges. Remote control and monitoring over Ethernet and GSM.
Visit teracom.ccWe analyzed Teracom.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 526 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
teracom.cc performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
526 ms
1409 ms
32 ms
292 ms
366 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Teracom.cc, 57% (13 requests) were made to Teracomsystems.com and 26% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Teracomsystems.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (33%)
3.6 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Teracom.cc main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Teracom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 627.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 627.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 461.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Teracom.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 461.4 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (50%)
14
7
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Teracom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
teracom.cc
526 ms
www.teracomsystems.com
1409 ms
css
32 ms
ed0db2795edbb014c3761428397a789b.css
292 ms
3e2b3639451b2ef718d19fe296fa6124.css
366 ms
f4dbbd78e15af69b0828bf323db0329c.js
488 ms
salvattore.min.js
364 ms
9d82908a9ea9b0927181d5dfe1fd4e60.js
382 ms
63c2404b4bc1ae729c013c90ec1fe77a.js
383 ms
8c82ee62b492edf1c483b09d05c6a7c2.js
439 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
162 ms
analytics.js
78 ms
Teracom-Control-solutions.png
126 ms
Remote-monitoring-and-control-solution.jpg
504 ms
7MygqTe2zs9YkP0adA9QQQ.ttf
71 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
88 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
97 ms
Uxzkqj-MIMWle-XP2pDNAA.ttf
109 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
108 ms
H1vB34nOKWXqzKotq25pcg.ttf
109 ms
modules.ttf
126 ms
collect
26 ms
lazyload.1.0.5.min.js
146 ms
teracom.cc accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
teracom.cc best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
teracom.cc SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Teracom.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Teracom.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
teracom.cc
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Teracom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: