4.8 sec in total
517 ms
3.8 sec
545 ms
Click here to check amazing Terminal content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about terminal.com
Terminal offers MSPLUS+, a guaranteed flat-rate IT service plan for Greater Boston. Receive expert, proactive, responsive, and personable support with this innovative combination of best-in-class IT t...
Visit terminal.comWe analyzed Terminal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 517 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
terminal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value5.2 s
60/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.185
66/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
517 ms
237 ms
476 ms
54 ms
168 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Terminal.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Terminal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (28%)
4.8 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Terminal.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.8 kB, which is 69% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 411.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Terminal needs image optimization as it can save up to 411.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 435.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 435.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 461.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Terminal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 461.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (55%)
53
24
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Terminal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
terminal.com
517 ms
www.terminal.com
237 ms
www.terminal.com
476 ms
css
54 ms
github.min.compiled.css
168 ms
application.compiled.css
631 ms
landing.compiled.css
423 ms
modernizr.custom.js
257 ms
jquery-2.0.3.min.js
515 ms
bootstrap.min.js
367 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
369 ms
jquery.scroller.js
342 ms
respond.js
418 ms
home.js
457 ms
snapshot-grid.jst.js
387 ms
landing.js
423 ms
afterResize.js
429 ms
moment.js
706 ms
jquery.isotope.js
643 ms
helpers.js
504 ms
jade-runtime.js
515 ms
underscore.js
649 ms
backbone.js
751 ms
app.js
729 ms
index.js
649 ms
navbar.jst.js
728 ms
analytics.js
106 ms
BukjPONmO1w
215 ms
pentagon-bg-01.png
263 ms
logo.png
89 ms
terminal-system-horiz.png
109 ms
cloudcontainers.png
216 ms
webterminal.png
1347 ms
oren.jpg
216 ms
blockquote.png
218 ms
jennifer.jpg
699 ms
zico.jpg
247 ms
chase.jpg
308 ms
anthony.jpg
308 ms
abernethy.jpg
493 ms
breanden.jpg
347 ms
enrique.jpg
1756 ms
carousel-np.png
371 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
147 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
152 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
154 ms
collect
31 ms
me
293 ms
hiring.js
299 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
70 ms
www-embed-player.js
99 ms
base.js
174 ms
icomoon.ttf
390 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
34 ms
ad_status.js
82 ms
search
230 ms
bubble-hiring.png
83 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
61 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
62 ms
nr-885.min.js
138 ms
rollbar.min.js
26 ms
terminal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
terminal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
terminal.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Terminal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Terminal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
terminal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Terminal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: