941 ms in total
35 ms
850 ms
56 ms
Welcome to testgutenberg.com homepage info - get ready to check Test Gutenberg best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about testgutenberg.com
A new editing experience for WordPress is in the works, code name Gutenberg. Read more about it and test it!
Visit testgutenberg.comWe analyzed Testgutenberg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 906 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
testgutenberg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.8 s
0/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value5,920 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.259
48/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
35 ms
186 ms
53 ms
70 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 135 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Testgutenberg.com, 99% (133 requests) were made to Wordpress.org and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (243 ms) relates to the external source Wordpress.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (41%)
3.1 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Testgutenberg.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testgutenberg.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 131 (98%)
133
2
The browser has sent 133 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test Gutenberg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 101 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
testgutenberg.com
35 ms
186 ms
gtm.js
53 ms
style.css
70 ms
style.css
70 ms
ponyfill.css
70 ms
buttons.min.css
87 ms
dashicons.min.css
116 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
88 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
90 ms
media-views.min.css
96 ms
imgareaselect.css
101 ms
editor.min.css
108 ms
style.css
110 ms
style.css
114 ms
style.css
119 ms
style.css
123 ms
style.css
130 ms
style.css
137 ms
common.min.css
133 ms
forms.min.css
136 ms
reset.css
141 ms
content.css
145 ms
editor.css
152 ms
style.css
154 ms
style.css
156 ms
style.css
156 ms
style.css
161 ms
style.css
165 ms
style.css
172 ms
style-editor.css
175 ms
media.min.css
176 ms
admin-menu.min.css
177 ms
admin-bar.min.css
183 ms
l10n.min.css
186 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
194 ms
react.min.js
197 ms
react-jsx-runtime.min.js
196 ms
index.min.js
136 ms
index.min.js
141 ms
index.min.js
143 ms
index.min.js
149 ms
index.min.js
138 ms
index.min.js
137 ms
react-dom.min.js
155 ms
index.min.js
136 ms
index.min.js
136 ms
index.min.js
134 ms
index.min.js
132 ms
index.min.js
132 ms
index.min.js
140 ms
index.min.js
137 ms
index.min.js
143 ms
index.min.js
218 ms
index.min.js
132 ms
index.min.js
130 ms
index.min.js
138 ms
index.min.js
140 ms
index.min.js
140 ms
index.min.js
135 ms
index.min.js
165 ms
index.min.js
141 ms
index.min.js
145 ms
moment.min.js
147 ms
index.min.js
150 ms
index.min.js
146 ms
index.min.js
147 ms
index.min.js
229 ms
index.min.js
158 ms
index.min.js
158 ms
index.min.js
150 ms
index.min.js
148 ms
index.min.js
176 ms
index.min.js
177 ms
index.min.js
176 ms
index.min.js
170 ms
index.min.js
243 ms
button.js
161 ms
link.js
167 ms
shared-modifications.js
166 ms
jquery.min.js
162 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
169 ms
underscore.min.js
170 ms
utils.min.js
169 ms
backbone.min.js
173 ms
wp-util.min.js
180 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
178 ms
media-models.min.js
178 ms
moxie.min.js
175 ms
plupload.min.js
173 ms
wp-plupload.min.js
178 ms
core.min.js
177 ms
mouse.min.js
199 ms
sortable.min.js
195 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
194 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
184 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
189 ms
api-request.min.js
181 ms
clipboard.min.js
176 ms
media-views.min.js
174 ms
editor.min.js
174 ms
index.min.js
199 ms
index.min.js
158 ms
index.min.js
156 ms
index.min.js
159 ms
index.min.js
165 ms
index.min.js
137 ms
index.min.js
149 ms
videopress-add-resumable-upload-support.js
145 ms
index.min.js
186 ms
index.min.js
159 ms
index.min.js
152 ms
index.min.js
156 ms
postbox.min.js
156 ms
index.min.js
155 ms
index.js
152 ms
index.js
146 ms
editor-modifications.js
166 ms
view.js
166 ms
heartbeat.min.js
162 ms
shortcode.min.js
155 ms
media-editor.min.js
151 ms
media-audiovideo.min.js
151 ms
quicktags.min.js
152 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
150 ms
common.min.js
146 ms
wplink.min.js
146 ms
menu.min.js
123 ms
autocomplete.min.js
127 ms
thickbox.js
130 ms
media-upload.min.js
123 ms
index.min.js
124 ms
index.min.js
132 ms
tinymce.min.js
178 ms
plugin.min.js
138 ms
testgutenberg.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
testgutenberg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
testgutenberg.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testgutenberg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testgutenberg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
testgutenberg.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Test Gutenberg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: