5.8 sec in total
405 ms
4.8 sec
598 ms
Visit texa.care now to see the best up-to-date TEXA content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about texa.care
Business unit TEXA dedicata alla telematica per la gestione da remoto delle flotte aziendali. Il primo e unico "Diagnostic Service Provider"
Visit texa.careWe analyzed Texa.care page load time and found that the first response time was 405 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
texa.care performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value29.0 s
0/100
10%
Value600 ms
49/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
405 ms
2446 ms
224 ms
333 ms
334 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Texa.care, 80% (53 requests) were made to Texatmd.it and 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Texatmd.it.
Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (70%)
3.3 MB
989.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Texa.care main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 215.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 215.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 501.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, TEXA needs image optimization as it can save up to 501.0 kB or 47% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 625.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 625.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 973.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texa.care needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 973.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (73%)
52
14
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TEXA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
texa.care
405 ms
www.texatmd.it
2446 ms
style.min.css
224 ms
classic-themes.min.css
333 ms
styles.css
334 ms
style.min.css
334 ms
style.css
337 ms
easySelectStyle.css
340 ms
theme.min.css
339 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
554 ms
frontend.min.css
881 ms
swiper.min.css
446 ms
frontend.min.css
1109 ms
all.min.css
564 ms
v4-shims.min.css
569 ms
style.css
561 ms
font-awesome.min.css
667 ms
style.min.css
675 ms
cmm4e-menu-skin-585.min.css
680 ms
cmm4e-menu-skin-skin-menu-top-secondario.min.css
685 ms
css
35 ms
fontawesome.min.css
889 ms
solid.min.css
789 ms
brands.min.css
794 ms
jquery.min.js
913 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
902 ms
wpo-minify-header-7720083f.js
908 ms
uc.js
25 ms
js
62 ms
stream-id1.css
991 ms
animations.min.css
1003 ms
regular.min.css
1021 ms
wpo-minify-footer-f8a774c2.js
1357 ms
wpo-minify-footer-0797197b.js
1026 ms
wpo-minify-footer-065d1204.js
1253 ms
logo-texa.png
123 ms
it.svg
152 ms
de.svg
151 ms
fr.svg
151 ms
es.svg
232 ms
gb.svg
231 ms
pl.svg
255 ms
ru.svg
252 ms
us.svg
253 ms
br.svg
333 ms
SA.png
352 ms
texatelemobility_logo.png
352 ms
TEXA-Azienda2.jpg
799 ms
TEXA-EIMA_2022-00-640x480.jpg
365 ms
20210922_181552-1-640x360.jpg
369 ms
TEXATMD_RobertoMoneda-640x360.jpg
559 ms
texa-roberto-moneda-1.jpg
465 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
358 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
368 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
35 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
46 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
70 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
82 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
83 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
82 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
83 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
82 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
82 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
531 ms
public.js
397 ms
public.css
444 ms
texa.care accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
texa.care best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
texa.care SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texa.care can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Italian language. Our system also found out that Texa.care main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
texa.care
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TEXA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: