2 sec in total
212 ms
1.5 sec
269 ms
Visit textsurf.com now to see the best up-to-date Textsurf content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about textsurf.com
Compare textbook prices on the leading new, used and rental textbook sites and enjoy the best textbook comparison experience for finding the cheapest textbooks online.
Visit textsurf.comWe analyzed Textsurf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
textsurf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.5 s
70/100
10%
212 ms
378 ms
59 ms
70 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Textsurf.com, 24% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (541 ms) relates to the external source Static.hotjar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 326.1 kB (57%)
574.6 kB
248.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Textsurf.com main page is 574.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 269.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Textsurf needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 173.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 173.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textsurf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (57%)
14
6
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textsurf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
textsurf.com
212 ms
www.textsurf.com
378 ms
css
59 ms
css
70 ms
application-4daa264b84eb700a4baeef9d120f6c4a.css
155 ms
application-17a5341ec9debc67c836ffd729e7f190.js
376 ms
f2af439a5b87aa87a6846c4a97dd1f1bc67b52c1.js
69 ms
ga.js
53 ms
hotjar-19816.js
541 ms
fbevents.js
191 ms
slogo.png
216 ms
header_bg1.jpg
216 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
152 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
177 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
198 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
188 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
198 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
199 ms
entypo.min.css
70 ms
css
60 ms
icomoon.woff
425 ms
entypo.woff
8 ms
collect
62 ms
111 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
textsurf.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
textsurf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
textsurf.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textsurf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Textsurf.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
textsurf.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Textsurf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: