2.4 sec in total
450 ms
1.5 sec
425 ms
Welcome to textuar.com homepage info - get ready to check Textuar best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about textuar.com
Are you looking for the best content writing services in India to grow online? Hire our experienced content writers to get 100% unique, high-quality content. Contact Now!
Visit textuar.comWe analyzed Textuar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 450 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
textuar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.8 s
0/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value15.3 s
1/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.1 s
9/100
10%
450 ms
50 ms
142 ms
92 ms
97 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Textuar.com, 17% (10 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Platform.linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (450 ms) belongs to the original domain Textuar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 233.1 kB (47%)
501.0 kB
267.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Textuar.com main page is 501.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 224.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Textuar needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 133.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 133.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textuar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (49%)
59
30
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textuar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.textuar.com
450 ms
ccm.base.css
50 ms
jquery.js
142 ms
ccm.base.js
92 ms
jquery.form.js
97 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
94 ms
colorbox.css
93 ms
slimmenu.css
93 ms
style.css
137 ms
960.css
134 ms
unoSlider.min.css
137 ms
platform.js
82 ms
in.js
41 ms
unoSlider-1.0.1.min.js
133 ms
jquery.slimmenu.js
131 ms
sdk.js
130 ms
widgets.js
179 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
286 ms
analytics.js
156 ms
dddd.gif
166 ms
bg4.png
262 ms
logo.png
166 ms
nav.png
165 ms
h.png
164 ms
choose.gif
165 ms
heading.png
280 ms
c1.png
259 ms
ic1.gif
259 ms
ic4.gif
260 ms
ic3.gif
259 ms
ic5.png
278 ms
btn.png
274 ms
heading-bg.png
273 ms
ce1c9bb9eec0bbd50df217d78105a29b_f4.jpg
275 ms
c0914f480743a1174f7ea00f80d2fc10_f3.jpg
274 ms
bg2.png
346 ms
fb.png
346 ms
twitter.png
344 ms
google.png
346 ms
linkedin.png
344 ms
pi.png
344 ms
rss.png
399 ms
overlay.png
398 ms
border.png
397 ms
controls.png
397 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
63 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
120 ms
fastbutton
232 ms
fastbutton
229 ms
192 ms
collect
90 ms
xd_arbiter.php
75 ms
xd_arbiter.php
146 ms
postmessageRelay
172 ms
rs=AGLTcCN1yeYqLWodvubIHJYf_WFhd-BjWg
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
58 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
56 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
66 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
43 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
textuar.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
textuar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
textuar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textuar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Textuar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
textuar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Textuar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: