Tools & Wizards About Us
texture.london screenshot

Report Summary

  • 2

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

texture.london

Texture London | Premium & Luxury Digital Marketing Agency

Page Load Speed

9 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

texture.london screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Texture content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about texture.london

We are an integrated digital advertising and marketing agency for premium and luxury brands. We execute beautiful digital marketing campaigns, engage with audiences online and build best in class digi...

Visit texture.london

Key Findings

We analyzed Texture.london page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

texture.london performance score

2

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,680 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.682

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

texture.london

1174 ms

style.min.css

407 ms

styles.css

254 ms

dashicons.min.css

517 ms

everest-forms.css

427 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Texture.london, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Texture.london.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 545.0 kB (14%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Texture.london main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 44.4 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 86.1 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Texture images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 160.2 kB

  • Original 273.0 kB
  • After minification 270.1 kB
  • After compression 112.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 160.2 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 262.7 kB

  • Original 333.8 kB
  • After minification 312.8 kB
  • After compression 71.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texture.london needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 262.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (47%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

36

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texture. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

texture.london

texture.london

1174 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

407 ms

styles.css

styles.css

254 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

517 ms

everest-forms.css

everest-forms.css

427 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.css

jquery.bxslider.min.css

272 ms

slick.css

slick.css

272 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

329 ms

fullpage.min.css

fullpage.min.css

354 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

624 ms

style.css

style.css

662 ms

texture-tweaks.css

texture-tweaks.css

435 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

640 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

494 ms

apbct-public--functions.min.js

apbct-public--functions.min.js

518 ms

apbct-public.min.js

apbct-public.min.js

549 ms

cleantalk-modal.min.js

cleantalk-modal.min.js

555 ms

js

js

66 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

491 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

774 ms

index.js

index.js

782 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

792 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

790 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

782 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

785 ms

fullpage.min.js

fullpage.min.js

792 ms

texture-home.js

texture-home.js

787 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

790 ms

texture-scripts.js

texture-scripts.js

790 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

792 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

131 ms

b4b966db9b0ef68d90a0fbbe32b120ca.gif

b4b966db9b0ef68d90a0fbbe32b120ca.gif

603 ms

bg-texture-3.png

bg-texture-3.png

340 ms

awwwards.png

awwwards.png

355 ms

hp1.jpg

hp1.jpg

494 ms

hp2.jpg

hp2.jpg

683 ms

hp3.jpg

hp3.jpg

1033 ms

bg-texture-1.png

bg-texture-1.png

339 ms

aboutbkg2.jpg

aboutbkg2.jpg

479 ms

luxuryfashion.jpeg

luxuryfashion.jpeg

344 ms

services2.jpg

services2.jpg

3880 ms

bg-texture-2.png

bg-texture-2.png

472 ms

joseph.png

joseph.png

579 ms

plogio.png

plogio.png

1168 ms

hunt.png

hunt.png

578 ms

mv.png

mv.png

660 ms

fg-13.png

fg-13.png

1021 ms

ovh.png

ovh.png

1024 ms

joseph.jpg

joseph.jpg

1076 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

1061 ms

pragnell.jpg

pragnell.jpg

1317 ms

hunt3.jpg

hunt3.jpg

1252 ms

mvcampaign.jpg

mvcampaign.jpg

1264 ms

fgshot.jpg

fgshot.jpg

1325 ms

ovh.jpg

ovh.jpg

1556 ms

texture-map.jpg

texture-map.jpg

1679 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

1299 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

1338 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

1354 ms

nav_bkg.jpg

nav_bkg.jpg

1379 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

170 ms

js

js

167 ms

FuturaPT-Book.woff

FuturaPT-Book.woff

999 ms

Raleway-Light.woff

Raleway-Light.woff

1068 ms

Raleway-SemiBold.woff

Raleway-SemiBold.woff

1088 ms

Raleway-Bold.woff

Raleway-Bold.woff

1105 ms

Raleway.woff

Raleway.woff

1190 ms

Raleway-Medium.woff

Raleway-Medium.woff

1179 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

292 ms

collect

collect

151 ms

collect

collect

136 ms

collect

collect

196 ms

118 ms

collect

collect

150 ms

82 ms

Accessibility Review

texture.london accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

texture.london best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

texture.london SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texture.london can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texture.london main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

texture.london

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Texture. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: