5.3 sec in total
231 ms
4.3 sec
797 ms
Click here to check amazing Texture Packer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about texturepacker.com
TexturePacker creates and optimizes sprite sheets for your game engine
Visit texturepacker.comWe analyzed Texturepacker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
texturepacker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value2.4 s
91/100
25%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
231 ms
801 ms
69 ms
91 ms
397 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Texturepacker.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Codeandweb.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.codeandweb.com.
Page size can be reduced by 246.5 kB (12%)
2.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Texturepacker.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.9 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Texture Packer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 155.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 155.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (9%)
34
31
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texture Packer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
texturepacker
231 ms
texturepacker
801 ms
all-8e3b1051476c19a2215f416d4d72421c.css
69 ms
all-771a1aeb658acd98fa0a18725d25aa4b.js
91 ms
t.gif
397 ms
analytics.js
109 ms
hotjar-99971.js
504 ms
codeandweb-tp.svg
40 ms
product-icons.png
508 ms
featurecarousel_texturepacker.png
532 ms
feature_autosd.png
511 ms
feature_multipack.png
531 ms
feature_quality.png
538 ms
feature_commandline.png
527 ms
feature_encryption.png
976 ms
feature_frameworks.png
990 ms
twitter-ricardoquesada.jpg
1005 ms
twitter-raywenderlich.png
995 ms
twitter-rongilbert.jpg
1004 ms
tp-references-colored-tiny.png
1010 ms
all-devices.png
1449 ms
feature_smartfolders.png
1466 ms
feature_spritefilter.png
1480 ms
feature_quality2.png
1494 ms
artist.png
1470 ms
contentprotection_2.png
1487 ms
pixelguy-juggling.png
1936 ms
trim-crop.png
1937 ms
auto-alias.png
1933 ms
heuristic-mask.png
1959 ms
downloadfreetrial-texturepacker.svg
1489 ms
texturepacker512.png
1964 ms
andreas-help-button.png
1976 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
2615 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1940 ms
collect
18 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
19 ms
visit-data
208 ms
texturepacker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
texturepacker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
texturepacker.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texturepacker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texturepacker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
texturepacker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Texture Packer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: