2.4 sec in total
154 ms
1.8 sec
431 ms
Welcome to texturequalitypro.com homepage info - get ready to check Texturequalitypro best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about texturequalitypro.com
Fotografo professionista di Milano che esegue servizi fotografici per aziende, cataloghi, foto di food, fotografie per il web, reportage, presentazioni e foto di people.
Visit texturequalitypro.comWe analyzed Texturequalitypro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
texturequalitypro.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value8.5 s
1/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value750 ms
39/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
154 ms
412 ms
177 ms
72 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Texturequalitypro.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Thumbs.dreamstime.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (888 ms) belongs to the original domain Texturequalitypro.com.
Page size can be reduced by 739.7 kB (30%)
2.5 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Texturequalitypro.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 312.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Texturequalitypro needs image optimization as it can save up to 312.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 284.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 284.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texturequalitypro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (14%)
65
56
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texturequalitypro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
texturequalitypro.com
154 ms
www.texturequalitypro.com
412 ms
jquery.min.js
177 ms
shared.min.js
72 ms
theme.js
73 ms
public.min.js
109 ms
jwplayer.min.js
242 ms
jquery.jstree.min.js
254 ms
public.css
107 ms
style.main.css
260 ms
index.js
144 ms
gallery.js
156 ms
ga.js
6 ms
banner_photo_125x125.gif
150 ms
overlay.png
54 ms
facebook.icon.png
52 ms
main.logo.jpg
50 ms
dropdown.arrow.png
52 ms
featured.bg.jpg
139 ms
LEFT_BANNER10_1.jpg
140 ms
160x600_Fotolia.jpg
141 ms
Shutter_160x600.jpg
141 ms
productshot.php
142 ms
productshot.php
143 ms
productshot.php
144 ms
productshot.php
174 ms
Dirty-old-rough-stippled-wall-surface.jpg
215 ms
Abstract-floral-pattern.jpg
195 ms
Dynamic-swirling-marbled-pattern.jpg
247 ms
Gravel-background.jpg
265 ms
Burnt-paint-on-the-wood-wall.jpg
467 ms
Cracked-tree-cross-section.jpg
339 ms
Green-water-balls.jpg
574 ms
Dressed-or-cut-stone-wall.jpg
448 ms
Background-texture-of-a-weathered-wooden-fence.jpg
455 ms
Spray-of-fresh-white-spring-blossom.jpg
582 ms
Mottled-marble-texture-and-pattern.jpg
540 ms
Closed-pink-tulips.jpg
563 ms
Metallic-horizontal-stripes-background.jpg
555 ms
Old-studded-wood-boards.jpg
593 ms
Grungy-rusting-metal-slats.jpg
612 ms
Waterworn-stones.jpg
630 ms
Beautiful-orange-sunset-at-twilight.jpg
637 ms
Dirty-grungy-rough-textured-wall.jpg
775 ms
Wall-made-of-interleaved-stones.jpg
701 ms
Sand-abstract-background.jpg
687 ms
Beautiful-yellow-rose-buds.jpg
753 ms
Vintage-wallpaper-with-little-blue-flowers.jpg
845 ms
Paint-drops-on-wall.jpg
849 ms
Old-studded-wooden-door-detail.jpg
857 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
js15.js
6 ms
Oswald-Light-webfont.woff
698 ms
DroidSans-webfont.woff
742 ms
Oswald-Regular-webfont.woff
742 ms
Old-rusted-metal-trellis.jpg
805 ms
0.php
79 ms
Textured-wood-background.jpg
761 ms
Woven-brown-fibres.jpg
723 ms
Old-stained-vintage-roses-wallpaper.jpg
789 ms
Background-texture-of-knotty-wooden-boards.jpg
797 ms
Papel-tapiz-wallpaper.jpg
793 ms
Old-blue-and-lilac-mosaic-texture.jpg
804 ms
Grungy-green-cement-wall.jpg
811 ms
Vintage-floral-marbled-pattern.jpg
888 ms
Grungy-stained-wall-texture.jpg
823 ms
Green-leaf-close-up.jpg
803 ms
Dried-pink-potpourri-background.jpg
779 ms
Banner_addons2.jpg
748 ms
Express_checkoutokok.jpg
711 ms
texturequalitypro.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
texturequalitypro.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
texturequalitypro.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
IT
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texturequalitypro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Texturequalitypro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
texturequalitypro.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Texturequalitypro. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: