Tools & Wizards About Us
thamesestuarypartnership.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

thamesestuarypartnership.org

Thames Estuary Partnership | Homepage | United Kingdom

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

92 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

thamesestuarypartnership.org screenshot

About Website

Visit thamesestuarypartnership.org now to see the best up-to-date Thames Estuary Partnership content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thamesestuarypartnership.org

Thames Estuary Partnership is a non-campaigning organisation looking after one of the world’s premier rivers. We provide a framework for sustainable management of the Thames, and as a membership organ...

Visit thamesestuarypartnership.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Thamesestuarypartnership.org page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thamesestuarypartnership.org performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.thamesestuarypartnership.org

92 ms

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

65 ms

polyfill.min.js

1256 ms

thunderbolt-commons.5df16dfe.bundle.min.js

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Thamesestuarypartnership.org, 32% (13 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (55%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

831.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Thamesestuarypartnership.org main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 978.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 249.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 978.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 43.6 kB

  • Original 384.7 kB
  • After minification 341.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Thames Estuary Partnership needs image optimization as it can save up to 43.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 245.0 kB
  • After minification 244.9 kB
  • After compression 240.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (38%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thames Estuary Partnership. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.thamesestuarypartnership.org

www.thamesestuarypartnership.org

92 ms

minified.js

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

65 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1256 ms

thunderbolt-commons.5df16dfe.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.5df16dfe.bundle.min.js

43 ms

main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js

main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js

46 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

45 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

44 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

46 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

51 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

48 ms

TEP_RGB_use_above30mmwide.jpg

TEP_RGB_use_above30mmwide.jpg

240 ms

ccef03_02ed5941c3b14a05994e5e2e3d9f4eb1~mv2_d_3912_2383_s_2.jpg

ccef03_02ed5941c3b14a05994e5e2e3d9f4eb1~mv2_d_3912_2383_s_2.jpg

431 ms

ccef03_10c48358604548a1a5b15f694984dd91~mv2.webp

ccef03_10c48358604548a1a5b15f694984dd91~mv2.webp

217 ms

ccef03_fa7ba2a3f0fc4269a8904ff8fdc0105b~mv2.webp

ccef03_fa7ba2a3f0fc4269a8904ff8fdc0105b~mv2.webp

332 ms

ccef03_23622384460f4a4ba649fc429dcede3c~mv2.webp

ccef03_23622384460f4a4ba649fc429dcede3c~mv2.webp

321 ms

ccef03_6bd0fcd921af4204a7db633ef824f8c3~mv2.webp

ccef03_6bd0fcd921af4204a7db633ef824f8c3~mv2.webp

183 ms

ccef03_6bd0fcd921af4204a7db633ef824f8c3~mv2.webp

ccef03_6bd0fcd921af4204a7db633ef824f8c3~mv2.webp

403 ms

ccef03_35549be4e2f149e08bba1a20326de898~mv2.webp

ccef03_35549be4e2f149e08bba1a20326de898~mv2.webp

470 ms

ccef03_35549be4e2f149e08bba1a20326de898~mv2.webp

ccef03_35549be4e2f149e08bba1a20326de898~mv2.webp

485 ms

ccef03_e613f38ceb4e49a6a264a9fd3fd32c89~mv2.jpg

ccef03_e613f38ceb4e49a6a264a9fd3fd32c89~mv2.jpg

550 ms

ccef03_63bdb6ee70164f66b91739c221a06928~mv2.jpg

ccef03_63bdb6ee70164f66b91739c221a06928~mv2.jpg

619 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

55 ms

file.woff

file.woff

262 ms

file.woff

file.woff

267 ms

103 ms

102 ms

99 ms

96 ms

101 ms

98 ms

146 ms

137 ms

141 ms

141 ms

138 ms

138 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

21 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

4 ms

Accessibility Review

thamesestuarypartnership.org accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

thamesestuarypartnership.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

thamesestuarypartnership.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thamesestuarypartnership.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thamesestuarypartnership.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thamesestuarypartnership.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thames Estuary Partnership. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: