2.3 sec in total
251 ms
1.6 sec
527 ms
Welcome to theluxurygap.com homepage info - get ready to check Theluxurygap best content right away, or after learning these important things about theluxurygap.com
At The Luxury Gap in Haslemere we provide the best essential and luxury beauty treatments in a calm and professional environment.
Visit theluxurygap.comWe analyzed Theluxurygap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 251 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
theluxurygap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.177
68/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
251 ms
412 ms
318 ms
239 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Theluxurygap.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (568 ms) belongs to the original domain Theluxurygap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 459.4 kB (38%)
1.2 MB
747.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Theluxurygap.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 577.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Theluxurygap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 257.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Theluxurygap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 142.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (60%)
50
20
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Theluxurygap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
theluxurygap.com
251 ms
www.theluxurygap.com
412 ms
style.css
318 ms
skeleton-responsive.css
239 ms
layout-responsive.css
160 ms
style-custom.css
243 ms
gdlr-woocommerce.css
244 ms
css
18 ms
style.min.css
180 ms
styles.css
238 ms
superfish.css
261 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
365 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
365 ms
flexslider.css
366 ms
jquery.js
404 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
367 ms
cufon.js
394 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
395 ms
Museo_Sans_500.font.js
549 ms
jquery.form.min.js
388 ms
scripts.js
388 ms
superfish.js
411 ms
supersub.js
412 ms
hoverIntent.js
411 ms
gdl-scripts.js
412 ms
jquery.easing.js
415 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
468 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
468 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
470 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
568 ms
wp-embed.min.js
490 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
312 ms
pattern-13.png
305 ms
ga.js
63 ms
maps
80 ms
lgap_1.jpg
309 ms
gradient-top4-32px.png
322 ms
gradient-top-gray-40px.png
323 ms
find-17px.png
324 ms
makeup-980x260.jpg
374 ms
massage-980x260.jpg
325 ms
treatment-980x260.jpg
325 ms
DSC01476-980x260.jpg
325 ms
gradient-vertical-6px.png
375 ms
ESPA-1857-Optimal-SHOT-6.jpg
376 ms
PROMOTE.jpg
563 ms
DSC01476-1024x528.jpg
562 ms
arrow4.png
400 ms
tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7OwQ.ttf
22 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf
24 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
embed
444 ms
bg_control_nav_custom.png
148 ms
bg_direction_nav_custom.png
149 ms
js
14 ms
theluxurygap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
theluxurygap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
theluxurygap.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Theluxurygap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Theluxurygap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
theluxurygap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Theluxurygap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: