Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

themediafinder.com

宁波公交路线站点详情数据-网站导航

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

390 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

52 ms

themediafinder.com screenshot

About Website

Visit themediafinder.com now to see the best up-to-date Themediafinder content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about themediafinder.com

宁波公交路线网站导航大全收集站点详情数据是针对上网用户开发的免费网站导航、分类网站导航平台,一键查找网站,宁波公交路线让找站变得简单。

Visit themediafinder.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Themediafinder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 390 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

themediafinder.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

themediafinder.com

390 ms

xz3.nb10.cc

489 ms

ad.js

222 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Themediafinder.com, 67% (2 requests) were made to Xz3.nb10.cc. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (489 ms) relates to the external source Xz3.nb10.cc.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 753 B (45%)

Content Size

1.7 kB

After Optimization

907 B

In fact, the total size of Themediafinder.com main page is 1.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 996 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 296 B

  • Original 664 B
  • After minification 631 B
  • After compression 368 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 296 B or 45% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 457 B

  • Original 996 B
  • After minification 996 B
  • After compression 539 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 457 B or 46% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Themediafinder. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

themediafinder.com accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

themediafinder.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

themediafinder.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Themediafinder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Themediafinder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Themediafinder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: