Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

699 ms

Resources Loaded

718 ms

Page Rendered

77 ms

thewordcount.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Thewordcount content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thewordcount.net

Visit thewordcount.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Thewordcount.net page load time and found that the first response time was 699 ms and then it took 795 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thewordcount.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thewordcount.net

699 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Thewordcount.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (699 ms) belongs to the original domain Thewordcount.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

5.0 kB

After Optimization

3.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Thewordcount.net main page is 5.0 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 3.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 232 B

  • Original 612 B
  • After minification 608 B
  • After compression 380 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 232 B or 38% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 3.0 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

thewordcount.net accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

thewordcount.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

thewordcount.net SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thewordcount.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Thewordcount.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thewordcount. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: