Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

thicknessplanerreviews.com

葡京网投-葡京网站充值-716.com

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

960 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

338 ms

thicknessplanerreviews.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Thicknessplanerreviews content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thicknessplanerreviews.com

人体秤, 厨房秤, 蓝牙秤, 脂肪秤, 乐易电子,乐易仕电子秤,中山市乐易电子科技有限公司,葡京网投,716.com

Visit thicknessplanerreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thicknessplanerreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 960 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thicknessplanerreviews.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.thicknessplanerreviews.com

960 ms

blue.php

210 ms

style.css

586 ms

styles.css

584 ms

jquery.js

676 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Thicknessplanerreviews.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (960 ms) belongs to the original domain Thicknessplanerreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 159.0 kB (33%)

Content Size

480.5 kB

After Optimization

321.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Thicknessplanerreviews.com main page is 480.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 273.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 22.3 kB
  • After minification 21.4 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 273.2 kB
  • After minification 243.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Thicknessplanerreviews needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 112.1 kB

  • Original 182.6 kB
  • After minification 180.6 kB
  • After compression 70.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 112.1 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 835 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thicknessplanerreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (50%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thicknessplanerreviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

thicknessplanerreviews.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thicknessplanerreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Thicknessplanerreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thicknessplanerreviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: