9.7 sec in total
2.6 sec
6 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to think.web.id homepage info - get ready to check Think best content for Indonesia right away, or after learning these important things about think.web.id
Think.Web we're one of the leading Digital Agencies in Indonesia, Giving our clients end-to-end services
Visit think.web.idWe analyzed Think.web.id page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
think.web.id performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value5.1 s
24/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value540 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.48
18/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
2618 ms
115 ms
171 ms
115 ms
174 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (110 requests) were addressed to the original Think.web.id, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Think.web.id.
Page size can be reduced by 721.7 kB (36%)
2.0 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Think.web.id main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Think images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 345.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 345.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 315.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Think.web.id needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 315.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (39%)
107
65
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Think. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
think.web.id
2618 ms
plugins.css
115 ms
style.css
171 ms
responsive.css
115 ms
animate.css
174 ms
horizontal.css
117 ms
coda-slider.css
119 ms
icons.css
289 ms
font-awesome.min.css
229 ms
chrome-orange.css
179 ms
liquid-slider.css
181 ms
animate.min.css
226 ms
jquery.min.js
403 ms
styles.css
247 ms
swfobject.js
6 ms
default_style.css
197 ms
wp-embed.min.js
234 ms
jquery.migrate.js
235 ms
retina-1.1.0.min.js
254 ms
jquery.outside-events.min.js
254 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
291 ms
jquery.parallax.js
292 ms
jquery.appear.js
294 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
310 ms
jquery.nav.js
311 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
345 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
348 ms
counter.js
349 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
438 ms
smooth-scroll.js
438 ms
contact-form.js
439 ms
main.js
438 ms
sly.js
438 ms
horizontal.js
438 ms
jquery.coda-slider-3.0.js
438 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
438 ms
jquery.liquid-slider.js
522 ms
sss.css
495 ms
owl.carousel.css
447 ms
owl.theme.css
446 ms
owl.transitions.css
444 ms
sss.js
443 ms
owl.carousel.js
437 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
175 ms
analytics.js
59 ms
loader-logo.png
159 ms
light-logo.png
156 ms
bgr-home.jpg
590 ms
icon-scrollme.png
251 ms
bg-a.jpg
584 ms
shd.png
250 ms
about-thinkweb-formula.png
578 ms
about-thinkweb-history.png
581 ms
bgd.jpg
251 ms
a.jpg
578 ms
b.jpg
579 ms
c.jpg
578 ms
bg-btm.jpg
578 ms
bg-b.jpg
661 ms
logo-woozin.png
580 ms
logo-inmotion.png
579 ms
logo-talklink.png
581 ms
logo-digify.png
581 ms
icon-serv.gif
582 ms
icon-serv-b.gif
545 ms
bg-c.jpg
624 ms
bgr-dark.jpg
566 ms
spcr.png
544 ms
p-unilever.gif
613 ms
p-acer.gif
1634 ms
p-miss-mondial.gif
1641 ms
p-guinness.gif
627 ms
josefinsans-bold-webfont.woff
670 ms
collect
58 ms
collect
184 ms
josefinsans-light-webfont.woff
637 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
637 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
637 ms
relwayd978.woff
961 ms
p-killkeny.gif
1733 ms
p-smirnoffice.gif
651 ms
p-sarigandum.gif
1704 ms
p-strepsils.gif
707 ms
p-dekoffie.gif
771 ms
p-toyota-yaris.gif
749 ms
p-nyamnyam.gif
813 ms
p-slaiolai.gif
877 ms
p-dunlop.gif
1632 ms
p-great-eastern.gif
613 ms
p-usbi.gif
677 ms
p-sampoerna.gif
741 ms
p-xl-axiata.gif
806 ms
p-merck.gif
872 ms
p-mandiri.gif
935 ms
p-sonybmg.gif
998 ms
p-hp.gif
1064 ms
p-huawei.gif
1130 ms
p-lippobank.gif
1222 ms
p-maybelline.gif
2221 ms
p-cleannclear.gif
1193 ms
p-bayer.gif
1258 ms
p-biore.gif
1288 ms
p-mens-biore.gif
1320 ms
p-petrolog.gif
1308 ms
p-xylitol.gif
1323 ms
p-hokben.gif
1336 ms
p-la-lights.gif
1307 ms
p-amild.gif
1361 ms
bg-d.jpg
1463 ms
bg-e-s.jpg
1409 ms
bg-e.jpg
2203 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1479 ms
arrowround.png
1410 ms
arrowrl.png
1400 ms
think.web.id accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
think.web.id best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
think.web.id SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Think.web.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Think.web.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
think.web.id
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Think. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: