9.4 sec in total
2.6 sec
5.6 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to thinkwhere.com homepage info - get ready to check ThinkWhere best content right away, or after learning these important things about thinkwhere.com
thinkWhere use leading edge cloud, Open Source and GIS technologies, to develop innovative software and solutions.
Visit thinkwhere.comWe analyzed Thinkwhere.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
thinkwhere.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.3 s
0/100
10%
Value27.1 s
0/100
25%
Value20.6 s
0/100
10%
Value780 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value27.0 s
0/100
10%
2557 ms
53 ms
489 ms
248 ms
344 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Thinkwhere.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdn-ukwest.onetrust.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Thinkwhere.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (33%)
6.2 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Thinkwhere.com main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 130.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ThinkWhere images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 695.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 695.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thinkwhere.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (62%)
77
29
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ThinkWhere. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.thinkwhere.com
2557 ms
gtm.js
53 ms
style.min.css
489 ms
style.css
248 ms
style.css
344 ms
font-awesome.min.css
438 ms
grid-system.css
431 ms
style.css
489 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
413 ms
css
33 ms
responsive.css
622 ms
style.css
510 ms
skin-original.css
510 ms
js_composer.min.css
597 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
684 ms
style.css
573 ms
css
59 ms
sg_popup_core.js
573 ms
jquery.min.js
657 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
656 ms
thinkwhere.css
655 ms
js
37 ms
OtAutoBlock.js
148 ms
otSDKStub.js
171 ms
dashicons.min.css
520 ms
display-opinions-light.css
598 ms
font-awesome.min.css
598 ms
salient-social.js
598 ms
jquery.easing.js
598 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
694 ms
priority.js
694 ms
transit.js
699 ms
waypoints.js
700 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
698 ms
hoverintent.js
706 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
699 ms
superfish.js
707 ms
init.js
987 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
828 ms
isotope.min.js
828 ms
nectar-blog.js
827 ms
touchswipe.min.js
827 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
789 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
860 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
764 ms
rotating_tweet.js
694 ms
underscore.min.js
690 ms
backbone.min.js
670 ms
front-end-deps.js
765 ms
front-end.js
696 ms
715a0a2b-5e51-4755-9f7b-332b8a88f76e.json
137 ms
thinkwhere-ground-mapper-logo.jpg
480 ms
think_where_home-1.jpg
484 ms
think_where_ICON1.png
484 ms
think_where_ICON2.png
622 ms
think_where_ICON3.png
623 ms
think-where-MillarBryce-logo.jpg
623 ms
think-where-balfour-beaty-logo.jpg
623 ms
thinkwhere-galbraith-logo.jpg
624 ms
1.png
624 ms
2-1.png
625 ms
3.png
589 ms
4.png
589 ms
5.png
655 ms
7.png
656 ms
6.png
560 ms
thinkwhere-icon-small.png
565 ms
location
182 ms
thinkWhere-home-2.jpg
607 ms
content-bg-2.jpg
576 ms
thinkWhere-home-insights.jpg
744 ms
thinkWhere-cta-bg.jpg
608 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
131 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
172 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
195 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
196 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
196 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
196 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
739 ms
icomoon.woff
635 ms
Idox_thinkWhere_WO-02-WEB.png
339 ms
groundmapper-thumbnail-1.jpg
375 ms
20210511_Blog_FionaHF-600x403.jpg
234 ms
MappingTheFuture-600x376.jpg
258 ms
remote3.jpg
546 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
87 ms
thinkwhere.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thinkwhere.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
thinkwhere.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thinkwhere.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thinkwhere.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thinkwhere.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ThinkWhere. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: