3.8 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.4 sec
174 ms
Welcome to thomas-muselet.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomas Muselet best content right away, or after learning these important things about thomas-muselet.com
Photos originales d'artistes internationals et de grands cuisiniers.
Visit thomas-muselet.comWe analyzed Thomas-muselet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
thomas-muselet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.3 s
0/100
10%
Value17.4 s
0/100
25%
Value17.6 s
0/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.1 s
1/100
10%
1212 ms
26 ms
82 ms
163 ms
244 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Thomas-muselet.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Thomas-muselet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 780.7 kB (28%)
2.7 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Thomas-muselet.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 204.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Muselet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 168.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 378.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomas-muselet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 378.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (56%)
34
15
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Muselet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomas-muselet.com
1212 ms
css
26 ms
grid.css
82 ms
base.css
163 ms
layout.css
244 ms
shortcodes.css
254 ms
magnific-popup.css
166 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
168 ms
enfold.css
264 ms
custom.css
240 ms
jquery.js
332 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
263 ms
avia-compat.js
319 ms
avia.js
408 ms
shortcodes.js
451 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
363 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
473 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
406 ms
comment-reply.min.js
471 ms
wp-embed.min.js
472 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
564 ms
logo-thomas-muselet-021.png
250 ms
Vignette-montage21.jpg
374 ms
vignette_021.jpg
463 ms
vignette_031.jpg
484 ms
vignette_041.jpg
524 ms
Vignette-montage_fashion1.jpg
445 ms
vignette_051.jpg
409 ms
vignette_061.jpg
615 ms
vignette_071.jpg
649 ms
Vignette-montage.jpg
686 ms
vignette_091.jpg
626 ms
vignette_101.jpg
732 ms
vignette_111.jpg
693 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
32 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
106 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
442 ms
print.css
88 ms
thomas-muselet.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thomas-muselet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
thomas-muselet.com SEO score
N/A
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomas-muselet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is French. Our system also found out that Thomas-muselet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomas-muselet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomas Muselet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: