1.2 sec in total
100 ms
999 ms
75 ms
Click here to check amazing Thomas Cleaning content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thomascleaning.co.uk
Some call us a cleaning company, but those who know us better view us as a professional service with more than 30 years’ experience of domestic cleaning and commercial cleaning.
Visit thomascleaning.co.ukWe analyzed Thomascleaning.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
thomascleaning.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
100 ms
42 ms
95 ms
33 ms
117 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Thomascleaning.co.uk, 38% (18 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (603 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 507.7 kB (35%)
1.5 MB
942.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomascleaning.co.uk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 794.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 433.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 433.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Cleaning images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (24%)
45
34
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Cleaning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.thomascleaning.co.uk
100 ms
minified.js
42 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
95 ms
polyfill.min.js
33 ms
267919.js
117 ms
thunderbolt-commons.813797e7.bundle.min.js
96 ms
main.6c492079.bundle.min.js
96 ms
lodash.min.js
96 ms
react.production.min.js
95 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
94 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
94 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
229 ms
Thomas%20Cleaning%20Logo.jpg
297 ms
bundle.min.js
136 ms
nsplsh_7a4c543356715745674f51~mv2_d_6000_4000_s_4_2.jpg
378 ms
Cleaning%20Sink.png
248 ms
Cleaning%20Sink.jpg
189 ms
Cleaning%20Sink.png
237 ms
Cleaning%20Sink.jpg
215 ms
Cleaning%20Sink.jpg
347 ms
Cleaning%20Sink.jpg
421 ms
Cleaning%20Sink.jpg
343 ms
Cleaning%20Sink.jpg
440 ms
66268b_cb93f6f0779e4648872ded77aa648fbf~mv2.jpg
405 ms
66268b_b6318fd77c7045a3b6012ec86823f1ba~mv2.jpg
536 ms
66268b_54785c41a6e44fb4b53ef908aa07252d~mv2.jpg
553 ms
66268b_009be494dc174d53948fcc1df31c8f7d~mv2.jpg
594 ms
66268b_1e53fd2bcd5b44baaf23648effe30423~mv2.jpg
581 ms
66268b_71578a10b2f54b0babd406f4073c8615~mv2.jpg
603 ms
66268b_7571d09d4fa1424e9907ed2f927ae145~mv2.jpg
602 ms
file.woff
478 ms
111 ms
110 ms
110 ms
108 ms
120 ms
118 ms
149 ms
149 ms
184 ms
183 ms
182 ms
178 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
7 ms
bolt-performance
25 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
12 ms
right-arrow.svg
12 ms
thomascleaning.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
thomascleaning.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
thomascleaning.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomascleaning.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomascleaning.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomascleaning.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomas Cleaning. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: