Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

thomascookinsure.com

Thomas Cook Holidays | Package Holidays, Hotels & City Breaks

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

168 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

411 ms

thomascookinsure.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to thomascookinsure.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomas Cook Insure best content right away, or after learning these important things about thomascookinsure.com

Book your next holiday at Thomas Cook – cheap deals with deposits from £39pp. Find your perfect package holiday deal with ATOL protection. Don't Just Book it. Thomas Cook it.

Visit thomascookinsure.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thomascookinsure.com page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thomascookinsure.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.172

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thomascookinsure.com

168 ms

www.thomascook.com

23 ms

www.thomascook.com

433 ms

sdv6oej.css

49 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Thomascookinsure.com, 89% (86 requests) were made to Thomascook.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Thomascook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 449.3 kB (88%)

Content Size

507.8 kB

After Optimization

58.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Thomascookinsure.com main page is 507.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 490.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 449.2 kB

  • Original 490.4 kB
  • After minification 401.2 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 89.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 449.2 kB or 92% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 62 B

  • Original 17.4 kB
  • After minification 17.4 kB
  • After compression 17.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (12%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

82

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Cook Insure. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

thomascookinsure.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

thomascookinsure.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

thomascookinsure.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomascookinsure.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomascookinsure.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomas Cook Insure. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: