2.8 sec in total
237 ms
2 sec
557 ms
Visit thomaswastemanagement.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Thomas Waste Management content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thomaswastemanagement.co.uk
Look no further than us for quick rubbish disposal. Thomas Waste Management Ltd provide a range of skip hire options to customers in the Brynmawr, Gwent area.
Visit thomaswastemanagement.co.ukWe analyzed Thomaswastemanagement.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 237 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
thomaswastemanagement.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.198
62/100
15%
Value6.9 s
53/100
10%
237 ms
557 ms
79 ms
115 ms
169 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Thomaswastemanagement.co.uk, 18% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (636 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomaswastemanagement.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 101.1 kB (6%)
1.6 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Thomaswastemanagement.co.uk main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.8 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Waste Management images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 35.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomaswastemanagement.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (43%)
42
24
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Waste Management. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomaswastemanagement.co.uk
237 ms
www.thomaswastemanagement.co.uk
557 ms
js
79 ms
jp-base.css
115 ms
style.css
169 ms
bootstrap.min.css
323 ms
default.css
250 ms
stylesheet.css
248 ms
hover.css
252 ms
font-awesome.min.css
249 ms
animate.css
251 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
326 ms
owl.theme.default.css
327 ms
aos.css
33 ms
css2
38 ms
jquery.min.js
402 ms
bootstrap.min.js
329 ms
fontawesome-all.js
636 ms
parallax.min.js
396 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
415 ms
aos.js
42 ms
main.js
414 ms
logo.png
169 ms
slider-1.jpg
311 ms
slider-2.jpg
236 ms
slider-3.jpg
313 ms
hvr-arw-left.png
139 ms
hvr-arw-right.png
139 ms
con-a-top-2.png
168 ms
con-a-right.png
317 ms
red-truck.png
314 ms
green-truck.png
237 ms
service-1-1.jpg
387 ms
service-2-2.jpg
316 ms
service-3-3.jpg
386 ms
mini-slider-1.jpg
469 ms
mini-slider-2.jpg
465 ms
mini-slider-3.jpg
392 ms
mini-slider-4.jpg
474 ms
footer-1.png
462 ms
footer-2.png
463 ms
cd-top-arrow.svg
470 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff
79 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff
91 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff
100 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff
116 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff
116 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff
116 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff
116 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
471 ms
RWmMoKWR9v4ksMfaWd_JN-XB.woff
113 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USeww.woff
116 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHvxo.woff
116 ms
con-b-full.png
411 ms
con-c-left.jpg
412 ms
thomaswastemanagement.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
thomaswastemanagement.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
thomaswastemanagement.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomaswastemanagement.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomaswastemanagement.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomaswastemanagement.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomas Waste Management. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: