4 sec in total
738 ms
2.8 sec
431 ms
Click here to check amazing Thought content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thought.digital
We’ve been helping our clients make thoughtful use of technology for over 20 years, creating web and mobile applications.
Visit thought.digitalWe analyzed Thought.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 738 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
thought.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
58/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.347
32/100
15%
Value7.7 s
46/100
10%
738 ms
235 ms
21 ms
34 ms
383 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Thought.digital, 46% (33 requests) were made to Thoughtcdn.blob.core.windows.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Thoughtcdn.blob.core.windows.net.
Page size can be reduced by 51.3 kB (7%)
727.2 kB
675.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Thought.digital main page is 727.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 473.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 897 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thought images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thought.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (35%)
66
43
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thought. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thought.digital
738 ms
ptr4bwx.js
235 ms
bootstrap.css
21 ms
layerslider.css
34 ms
animate.css
383 ms
unslider.css
373 ms
main.css
35 ms
font-awesome.min.css
30 ms
pixelaid-client.css
426 ms
31117.js
57 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
api.js
37 ms
bootstrap.min.js
42 ms
greensock.js
43 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
47 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
56 ms
unslider-min.js
51 ms
animations.js
59 ms
main.js
75 ms
ga.js
363 ms
ai.0.js
336 ms
analytics.js
362 ms
5d9595ef-ef3a-4519-98bc-1d33872f83bf.js
362 ms
j.php
462 ms
slide-03.png
855 ms
logo.png
290 ms
thought.png
430 ms
facebook.png
235 ms
twitter.png
430 ms
slide-29.png
773 ms
slide-14.png
690 ms
slide-05.png
853 ms
slide-32.png
772 ms
slide-17.png
691 ms
slide-07.png
855 ms
slide-35.png
776 ms
slide-20.png
857 ms
slide-09.png
858 ms
slide-38.png
860 ms
slide-23.png
935 ms
slide-11.png
939 ms
slide-41.png
929 ms
slide-26.png
931 ms
02-case-studies-landing-45_w143.png
933 ms
02-case-studies-landing-58_w143.png
939 ms
02-case-studies-landing-72_w143.png
1007 ms
02-case-studies-landing-59_w143.png
1017 ms
02-case-studies-landing-46_w143.png
1017 ms
02-case-studies-landing-47_w143.png
1016 ms
02-case-studies-landing-48_w143.png
1019 ms
02-case-studies-landing-49_w143.png
1018 ms
02-case-studies-landing-50_w143.png
1092 ms
02-case-studies-landing-57_w143.png
1104 ms
02-case-studies-landing-60_w143.png
1102 ms
02-case-studies-landing-61_w143.png
1102 ms
02-case-studies-landing-62_w143.png
1104 ms
02-case-studies-landing-69_w143.png
1106 ms
02-case-studies-landing-70_w143.png
1177 ms
02-case-studies-landing-71_w143.png
1200 ms
02-case-studies-landing-73_w143.png
1199 ms
02-case-studies-landing-74_w143.png
1199 ms
recaptcha__en.js
383 ms
d
197 ms
d
199 ms
d
228 ms
d
311 ms
collect
76 ms
__utm.gif
55 ms
v.gif
14 ms
p.gif
36 ms
skin.css
343 ms
thought.digital accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
thought.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
thought.digital SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thought.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thought.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thought.digital
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thought. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: