5.2 sec in total
120 ms
4.9 sec
212 ms
Click here to check amazing Tiger Tools content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tiger-tools.com
Visit tiger-tools.comWe analyzed Tiger-tools.com page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
tiger-tools.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
120 ms
98 ms
3391 ms
30 ms
196 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Tiger-tools.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Tiger-tools.com.
Page size can be reduced by 251.0 kB (24%)
1.0 MB
787.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Tiger-tools.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 394.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 223.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 223.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tiger Tools images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tiger-tools.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (88%)
74
9
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tiger Tools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tiger-tools.com
120 ms
www.tiger-tools.com
98 ms
www.tiger-tools.com
3391 ms
formreset.min.css
30 ms
formsmain.min.css
196 ms
readyclass.min.css
32 ms
browsers.min.css
30 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
229 ms
basic.min.css
54 ms
theme.min.css
42 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
45 ms
woocommerce.css
56 ms
style.min.css
209 ms
style.css
56 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
76 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
72 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
85 ms
hooks.min.js
88 ms
w.js
16 ms
jquery.min.js
95 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
101 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
107 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
280 ms
js.cookie.min.js
117 ms
woocommerce.min.js
132 ms
wc-blocks.css
121 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
140 ms
order-attribution.min.js
151 ms
react.min.js
164 ms
deprecated.min.js
173 ms
dom.min.js
196 ms
react-dom.min.js
393 ms
escape-html.min.js
397 ms
element.min.js
373 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
210 ms
i18n.min.js
215 ms
keycodes.min.js
222 ms
priority-queue.min.js
223 ms
compose.min.js
255 ms
private-apis.min.js
235 ms
redux-routine.min.js
246 ms
data.min.js
254 ms
lodash.min.js
261 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
259 ms
url.min.js
406 ms
api-fetch.min.js
329 ms
css
30 ms
style.css
254 ms
wc-settings.js
311 ms
data-controls.min.js
305 ms
html-entities.min.js
296 ms
notices.min.js
295 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
303 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
297 ms
dom-ready.min.js
310 ms
a11y.min.js
298 ms
primitives.min.js
481 ms
warning.min.js
283 ms
blocks-components.js
453 ms
blocks-checkout.js
257 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
246 ms
scripts.min.js
259 ms
jquery.mobile.js
247 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
405 ms
common.js
259 ms
g.gif
52 ms
gtm.js
108 ms
bg.jpg
351 ms
cropped-deafaultlogo.png
351 ms
slide-bg.jpg
120 ms
guage.png
136 ms
map.png
140 ms
et-divi-dynamic-5-late.css
127 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM3OwRmPnws9IqGuw.ttf
66 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4rQwOwRmPnws9IqGuw.ttf
110 ms
modules.woff
344 ms
js
54 ms
logo-slide.png
249 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
177 ms
style.min.css
13 ms
modules.woff
183 ms
tiger-tools.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tiger-tools.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tiger-tools.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tiger-tools.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tiger-tools.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tiger-tools.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tiger Tools. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: