7.2 sec in total
204 ms
6.6 sec
359 ms
Visit tigerpress.com now to see the best up-to-date Tiger Press content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tigerpress.com
TigerPress is a leading provider of printing, packaging and fulfillment solutions. From booklets to folding cartons to digital printing and signage, we can produce and ship nationwide from our plant i...
Visit tigerpress.comWe analyzed Tigerpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
tigerpress.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value960 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.965
2/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
204 ms
822 ms
215 ms
1606 ms
662 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerpress.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Tigerpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 379.6 kB (44%)
870.9 kB
491.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Tigerpress.com main page is 870.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 362.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 325.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 325.6 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tiger Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (84%)
50
8
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tiger Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tigerpress.com
204 ms
www.tigerpress.com
822 ms
all.css
215 ms
e915ecb3d8927b1bd5da6093313fa103.min.css
1606 ms
min-shbp.min.css
662 ms
min-768-max-1024-l.min.css
692 ms
min-sh-cbp.min.css
706 ms
v4-shims.css
268 ms
js
75 ms
js
115 ms
js
122 ms
style.min.css
1374 ms
jquery.min.js
1412 ms
b4e3aec6bfb45e51c21c8359381364aa.min.js
1510 ms
Mnd4w4eIFC
631 ms
TigerPress-640-300x75.png
188 ms
Custom-Printed-Boxes-1.png
190 ms
tigerimage.jpg
188 ms
conversion_async.js
186 ms
awb-icons.woff
103 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
104 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
105 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
210 ms
Mnd4w4eIFC
206 ms
max-1c.min.css
88 ms
max-2c.min.css
63 ms
81 ms
112 ms
min-2c-max-3c.min.css
32 ms
Mnd4w4eIFC
631 ms
55 ms
min-3c-max-4c.min.css
28 ms
34 ms
min-4c-max-5c.min.css
23 ms
min-5c-max-6c.min.css
23 ms
max-shbp.min.css
12 ms
max-sh-shbp.min.css
12 ms
min-768-max-1024-p.min.css
37 ms
max-sh-cbp.min.css
40 ms
max-sh-sbp.min.css
13 ms
max-sh-640.min.css
20 ms
max-shbp-18.min.css
12 ms
max-shbp-32.min.css
12 ms
max-640.min.css
23 ms
max-main.min.css
12 ms
max-cbp.min.css
31 ms
max-sh-cbp-social-sharing.min.css
16 ms
max-sh-cbp.min.css
19 ms
min-768-max-1024-p.min.css
18 ms
max-640.min.css
21 ms
max-1c.css
13 ms
max-2c.css
12 ms
min-2c-max-3c.css
13 ms
min-3c-max-4c.css
12 ms
min-4c-max-5c.css
12 ms
min-5c-max-6c.css
12 ms
tigerpress.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
tigerpress.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tigerpress.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigerpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tigerpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tigerpress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tiger Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: