Tools & Wizards About Us
tilelifestudios.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

tilelifestudios.com

Elementor Hosting | This site is private

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

808 ms

tilelifestudios.com screenshot

About Website

Visit tilelifestudios.com now to see the best up-to-date Tilelifestudios content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tilelifestudios.com

TileLife – superior quality tiling essentials for professionals & DIY enthusiasts. Get grouts, adhesives & trowels for all tiling projects & domestic/commercial use. Join the TileLife community to mak...

Visit tilelifestudios.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tilelifestudios.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tilelifestudios.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.777

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tilelifestudios.com

77 ms

tilelifestudios.com

191 ms

oeepuess.elementor.cloud

121 ms

oeepuess.elementor.cloud

168 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Tilelifestudios.com, 78% (61 requests) were made to Oeepuess.elementor.cloud and 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (481 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 390.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tilelifestudios.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 64.9 kB

  • Original 81.2 kB
  • After minification 78.7 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 325.0 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tilelifestudios needs image optimization as it can save up to 325.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 286 B

  • Original 402.0 kB
  • After minification 402.0 kB
  • After compression 401.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 705 B

  • Original 58.6 kB
  • After minification 58.6 kB
  • After compression 57.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tilelifestudios.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (83%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tilelifestudios. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tilelifestudios.com

tilelifestudios.com

77 ms

tilelifestudios.com

tilelifestudios.com

191 ms

oeepuess.elementor.cloud

oeepuess.elementor.cloud

121 ms

oeepuess.elementor.cloud

oeepuess.elementor.cloud

168 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

116 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

93 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

61 ms

elementor.css

elementor.css

94 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

60 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

91 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

104 ms

post-4.css

post-4.css

136 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

110 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

147 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

148 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

132 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

195 ms

post-14.css

post-14.css

162 ms

post-23.css

post-23.css

165 ms

css

css

61 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

183 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

208 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

186 ms

js

js

115 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

195 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

210 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

211 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

224 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

218 ms

widget-call-to-action.min.css

widget-call-to-action.min.css

271 ms

transitions.min.css

transitions.min.css

225 ms

widget-slides.min.css

widget-slides.min.css

270 ms

widget-form.min.css

widget-form.min.css

240 ms

widget-google_maps.min.css

widget-google_maps.min.css

244 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

253 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

279 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

270 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

274 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

280 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

294 ms

e-202448.js

e-202448.js

52 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

64 ms

script.js

script.js

109 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

326 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

254 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

252 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

220 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

233 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

274 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

297 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

227 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

266 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

219 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

236 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

218 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

232 ms

password-lock

password-lock

343 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

238 ms

47 ms

174 ms

Original-on-Transparent.png

Original-on-Transparent.png

224 ms

Tiling-Accessories-1000-x-100.jpg

Tiling-Accessories-1000-x-100.jpg

101 ms

Tiles-Front-Cover-1000-x-100.jpg

Tiles-Front-Cover-1000-x-100.jpg

101 ms

Front-Page-Promotion.jpg

Front-Page-Promotion.jpg

99 ms

Front-Page-Promotion-DB-1920-x-700.jpg

Front-Page-Promotion-DB-1920-x-700.jpg

103 ms

Front-Page-Promotion-RUBI-1920-x-700.jpg

Front-Page-Promotion-RUBI-1920-x-700.jpg

101 ms

TileLife-Logo-1200-x-1200-Footer-150x150.png

TileLife-Logo-1200-x-1200-Footer-150x150.png

217 ms

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hAc5a1PiKg.woff

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hAc5a1PiKg.woff

31 ms

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hGA5a1PiKg.woff

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hGA5a1PiKg.woff

85 ms

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hEk5a1PiKg.woff

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hEk5a1PiKg.woff

200 ms

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hD45a1PiKg.woff

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hD45a1PiKg.woff

63 ms

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hNI-a1PiKg.woff

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hNI-a1PiKg.woff

85 ms

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hOA-a1PiKg.woff

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hOA-a1PiKg.woff

54 ms

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hL4-a1PiKg.woff

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hL4-a1PiKg.woff

86 ms

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hGA-a1PiKg.woff

SLXgc1nY6HkvangtZmpQdkhzfH5lkSs2SgRjCAGMQ1z0hGA-a1PiKg.woff

132 ms

embed

embed

481 ms

main.js

main.js

20 ms

js

js

33 ms

Accessibility Review

tilelifestudios.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tilelifestudios.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

tilelifestudios.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tilelifestudios.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tilelifestudios.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tilelifestudios.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tilelifestudios. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: