4.1 sec in total
239 ms
3.2 sec
664 ms
Visit timestandard.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Time Standard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about timestandard.co.uk
Time and Attendance Systems, Clocking In Machines for Biometric Face, Fingerprint, Hand, Telephone, Mobiles, Local or CLOUD. Est over 30 years.
Visit timestandard.co.ukWe analyzed Timestandard.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
timestandard.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value4.8 s
66/100
10%
Value420 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
239 ms
358 ms
242 ms
198 ms
202 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Timestandard.co.uk, 23% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 11% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Timestandard.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 62.7 kB (6%)
969.7 kB
907.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Timestandard.co.uk main page is 969.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 674.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Time Standard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 16 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Timestandard.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (40%)
48
29
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Time Standard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
timestandard.co.uk
239 ms
www.timestandard.co.uk
358 ms
vdl7ifk.js
242 ms
app.min.css
198 ms
fonts.css
202 ms
app.min.js
517 ms
email-decode.min.js
19 ms
ga.js
23 ms
gtm.js
50 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
js
58 ms
34 ms
35 ms
TimeStandard-time-attendance.png
633 ms
Timestandard-home-mob-image.png
616 ms
rolls.png
246 ms
renault.png
564 ms
arriva.png
595 ms
colins.png
639 ms
Ferro.png
586 ms
exclusive.png
807 ms
tesco.png
818 ms
sainsburys.png
845 ms
tc.png
856 ms
nikken.png
874 ms
bq.png
892 ms
mcdonalds.png
1059 ms
home_case_1.jpg
1311 ms
home_case_m1.jpg
1144 ms
home_case_2.jpg
1395 ms
home_case_m2.jpg
1311 ms
home_case_3.jpg
1503 ms
home_case_m3b.jpg
1511 ms
home_clock.jpg
1656 ms
demo_1.jpg
1718 ms
iso-footer.png
1493 ms
timestandard.woff
1641 ms
1hd188rpj
218 ms
d
42 ms
d
62 ms
d
63 ms
d
62 ms
d
63 ms
p.gif
17 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
167 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
61 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
62 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
58 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
57 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
76 ms
twk-main.js
115 ms
twk-vendor.js
142 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
184 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
75 ms
twk-runtime.js
93 ms
twk-app.js
93 ms
timestandard.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
timestandard.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
timestandard.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Timestandard.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Timestandard.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
timestandard.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Time Standard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: