2.4 sec in total
771 ms
1.5 sec
74 ms
Click here to check amazing Tinney Tool content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tinneytool.com
Proudly Machining Precision Parts In America For Over 22 years. Contact Us Today To See What Makes Tinney Tool Different!
Visit tinneytool.comWe analyzed Tinneytool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 771 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
tinneytool.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value29.3 s
0/100
10%
Value42,800 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value56.5 s
0/100
10%
771 ms
100 ms
201 ms
208 ms
200 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tinneytool.com, 52% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 33% (11 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (771 ms) belongs to the original domain Tinneytool.com.
Page size can be reduced by 276.4 kB (60%)
461.5 kB
185.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Tinneytool.com main page is 461.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 366.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 272.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 272.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tinney Tool images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (33%)
27
18
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tinney Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.tinneytool.com
771 ms
minified.js
100 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
201 ms
polyfill.min.js
208 ms
bootstrap-features.24d4529b.bundle.min.js
200 ms
main.24eb524d.bundle.min.js
199 ms
lodash.min.js
196 ms
react.production.min.js
194 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
194 ms
thunderbolt
28 ms
thunderbolt
8 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
53 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
53 ms
f649ba_43c594bf64544593ae8ea8115034442b.jpg
246 ms
f649ba_826b08bc9a15487f8cbd88f2111895e6.png
605 ms
f649ba_741c9c5d9b96405b9d2ddac60a26b9dcf000.jpg
355 ms
5c17a3f4fffb44a38f9e087e1793bd0c.png
231 ms
f43cb85404b54190be558c08e1d47300.png
219 ms
a60b901325f94c82b7366ec0927c04b0.png
231 ms
NTMA-Side-Tag.jpg
475 ms
f649ba_687d4a46421c4a92ada1bb75cbfde217.png
433 ms
f649ba_2fbd9c533e404482b2614d7dafcda95b.png
483 ms
f649ba_64439c260f7544bda300b00d8321e224.png
424 ms
f649ba_198ca0c9353542f7a5a5b2caf9a2627d.png
648 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
6 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
7 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
15 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
15 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
26 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
10 ms
right-arrow.svg
10 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
3 ms
tinneytool.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
tinneytool.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tinneytool.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tinneytool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tinneytool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tinneytool.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tinney Tool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: