2.4 sec in total
49 ms
1.3 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Tinylab content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tinylab.cc
prototype easier than ever
Visit tinylab.ccWe analyzed Tinylab.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
tinylab.cc performance score
49 ms
195 ms
23 ms
31 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Tinylab.cc, 34% (34 requests) were made to 0 and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (353 ms) relates to the external source .
Page size can be reduced by 996.6 kB (44%)
2.3 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Tinylab.cc main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tinylab needs image optimization as it can save up to 256.8 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 474.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 474.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 219.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tinylab.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 219.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (25%)
57
43
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tinylab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
tinylab.cc
49 ms
www.tinylab.cc
195 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
23 ms
renew.css
31 ms
css
30 ms
jquery.js
28 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
68 ms
x-head.min.js
58 ms
cs-head.min.js
58 ms
x-body.min.js
112 ms
comment-reply.min.js
55 ms
cs-body.min.js
115 ms
wp-embed.min.js
133 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
134 ms
froogaloop.min.js
122 ms
60.png
325 ms
3-1024x682-1.jpg
299 ms
tinylab21323423-1.png
300 ms
ipad-1.png
307 ms
open-source-1.png
301 ms
os-2.png
306 ms
scratch.jpg
306 ms
processor.png
307 ms
flash.png
308 ms
sram.png
309 ms
eeprom_int.png
310 ms
clock.png
312 ms
operating_voltage.png
311 ms
input_voltage.png
314 ms
voltage_limi.png
334 ms
io.png
332 ms
analog_input.png
334 ms
pwm.png
336 ms
sensors.png
336 ms
leds.png
337 ms
buttons.png
338 ms
connectivity.png
338 ms
display.png
340 ms
buzzer.png
341 ms
os.png
341 ms
usb.png
342 ms
compatible.png
344 ms
weight.png
345 ms
dimensions.png
346 ms
other.png
347 ms
makerkit.png
347 ms
iotkit.png
349 ms
exclusivekit.png
351 ms
Untitled-22-1024x768-1.jpg
353 ms
analytics.js
308 ms
60.png
74 ms
3-1024x682-1.jpg
68 ms
tinylab21323423-1.png
70 ms
open-source-1.png
129 ms
os-2.png
121 ms
ipad-1.png
65 ms
scratch.jpg
119 ms
processor.png
119 ms
flash.png
121 ms
sram.png
118 ms
eeprom_int.png
118 ms
clock.png
119 ms
operating_voltage.png
120 ms
input_voltage.png
121 ms
58Izk0DtN5Jbz2A0aXUD5gLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
42 ms
pQ091WwCqK_i0BhMWeZ4BPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
93 ms
tt5AAuT6S0d4gBsMij-6wwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
97 ms
_r9i_iCDHMJqAy28ODSA_gLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
90 ms
OXYTDOzBcXU8MTNBvBHeSZnL5RH1T3ceV4GPyld14wM.ttf
89 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
108 ms
io.png
100 ms
voltage_limi.png
104 ms
analog_input.png
98 ms
pwm.png
99 ms
sensors.png
100 ms
leds.png
100 ms
buttons.png
100 ms
connectivity.png
100 ms
display.png
99 ms
buzzer.png
98 ms
os.png
145 ms
usb.png
141 ms
compatible.png
95 ms
weight.png
139 ms
dimensions.png
142 ms
other.png
140 ms
makerkit.png
140 ms
iotkit.png
141 ms
exclusivekit.png
138 ms
Untitled-22-1024x768-1.jpg
138 ms
collect
75 ms
150778573
107 ms
player.js
113 ms
player.css
87 ms
ga.js
48 ms
vuid.min.js
101 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
proxy.html
40 ms
551090220.jpg
283 ms
tinylab.cc SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tinylab.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tinylab.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tinylab.cc
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tinylab. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: