2.7 sec in total
116 ms
1.7 sec
931 ms
Visit tinylittlebusinesses.com now to see the best up-to-date Tinylittlebusinesses content for Nigeria and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tinylittlebusinesses.com
From: the laptop of Ben Brooks Location: Braintree, Essex (UK) Date: May 21, 2013 at 1:28pm Hey, I’m Ben, and I’ve been a struggling marketer for a
Visit tinylittlebusinesses.comWe analyzed Tinylittlebusinesses.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
tinylittlebusinesses.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.194
63/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
116 ms
66 ms
28 ms
127 ms
84 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Tinylittlebusinesses.com, 13% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to My.leadpages.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (608 ms) relates to the external source My.leadpages.net.
Page size can be reduced by 642.7 kB (40%)
1.6 MB
974.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Tinylittlebusinesses.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 804.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tinylittlebusinesses images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 405.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 405.9 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 182.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tinylittlebusinesses.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 182.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (74%)
89
23
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tinylittlebusinesses. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tinylittlebusinesses.com
116 ms
css.css
66 ms
css
28 ms
genericons.css
127 ms
style-global.css
84 ms
style-layout-full.css
82 ms
style-layout-compact.css
83 ms
style-layout-horizontal.css
86 ms
style-skin-blue.css
122 ms
style-skin-teal.css
124 ms
style-skin-light_green.css
125 ms
style-skin-green.css
126 ms
style-skin-orange.css
126 ms
style-skin-pink.css
131 ms
style-skin-purple.css
132 ms
style-skin-red.css
132 ms
style-skin-yellow.css
133 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
136 ms
jetpack.css
138 ms
style.css
159 ms
jquery.js
192 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
172 ms
prettyPhoto.js
173 ms
fancybox.js
173 ms
fancybox_easing.js
178 ms
fancybox_mousewheel.js
188 ms
wp_lightbox_special_mootools_core.js
234 ms
wp_lightbox_special_Quickie.js
215 ms
wp_lightbox_special_Adv.js
216 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
217 ms
flowplayer-3.2.6.min.js
232 ms
wllogin.external.js
233 ms
wp-faq.js
256 ms
prettyPhoto.css
259 ms
fancybox.css
262 ms
wp-lightbox-special.css
263 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
263 ms
E-v1.js
135 ms
leadbox-623.js
23 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
72 ms
gprofiles.js
73 ms
landing.js
116 ms
e-201609.js
3 ms
wp_lightbox_ultimate.css
253 ms
webfontloader.js
22 ms
wp_lightbox_ultimate_custom.css
200 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
285 ms
wpgroho.js
221 ms
skin.min.js
221 ms
core.min.js
219 ms
css
40 ms
widget.min.js
242 ms
accordion.min.js
240 ms
wp-embed.min.js
240 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
241 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
24 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nmFp2sMiApZm5Dx7NpSTOZk.woff
45 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nnl4twXkwp3_u9ZoePkT564.woff
57 ms
So5lHxHT37p2SS4-t60SlHpumDtkw9GHrrDfd7ZnWpU.woff
56 ms
EYh7Vl4ywhowqULgRdYwIG0Xvi9kvVpeKmlONF1xhUs.woff
55 ms
EYh7Vl4ywhowqULgRdYwIL0qgHI2SEqiJszC-CVc3gY.woff
56 ms
sDRi4fY9bOiJUbgq53yZCfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
38 ms
QABk9IxT-LFTJ_dQzv7xpIbN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
38 ms
03aPdn7fFF3H6ngCgAlQzBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
36 ms
LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff
37 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
36 ms
PIPMHY90P7jtyjpXuZ2cLD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
42 ms
mixpanel-2.2.min.js
7 ms
andre-cred_large.png
290 ms
heart-8bit.png
165 ms
TLB.png
290 ms
note-about-ben.png
89 ms
ben.png
167 ms
facebook-ads-campaign.png
91 ms
clicky.png
179 ms
subscribers.png
91 ms
clickbank.png
165 ms
survey.png
163 ms
gmail.png
180 ms
workflow_hidden_530.png
189 ms
click-to-continue.png
179 ms
gtm.js
88 ms
49 ms
iframe_shim
88 ms
can-i-show.js
53 ms
brjhrywflc.json
31 ms
9vYsg5VgPHKK8SXYbf3sMupm9E4gBdgiUiSJePew_SQ.woff
105 ms
analytics.js
103 ms
7c2b2f01508b2da106962c4b4b3e87a2218426e9.jpg
93 ms
collect
13 ms
js
171 ms
hovercard.css
45 ms
services.css
70 ms
43 ms
608 ms
i.js
17 ms
082866998600c45910481f2b50e2a805fdb84e2c.1.js
33 ms
g.gif
3 ms
in.php
133 ms
mput
90 ms
form.css
72 ms
form.js
77 ms
css_browser_selector.js
112 ms
tinylittlebusinesses.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
tinylittlebusinesses.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tinylittlebusinesses.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tinylittlebusinesses.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tinylittlebusinesses.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tinylittlebusinesses.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tinylittlebusinesses. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: