1.7 sec in total
261 ms
958 ms
459 ms
Visit tomasacker.com now to see the best up-to-date Tom ASACKER content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tomasacker.com
We become the stories we tell.
Visit tomasacker.comWe analyzed Tomasacker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
tomasacker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value1,810 ms
9/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.3 s
24/100
10%
261 ms
15 ms
120 ms
138 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tomasacker.com, 17% (8 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 15% (7 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (261 ms) belongs to the original domain Tomasacker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 387.7 kB (58%)
671.6 kB
283.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Tomasacker.com main page is 671.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 426.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tom ASACKER images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 328.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 328.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tomasacker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (61%)
28
11
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tom ASACKER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tomasacker.com
261 ms
webfont.js
15 ms
120 ms
css
138 ms
130 ms
125 ms
134 ms
s1.wp.com
173 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
131 ms
tiled-gallery.css
112 ms
130 ms
widgets.js
97 ms
112 ms
w.js
95 ms
yqa0yrp.js
234 ms
merriweather.css
21 ms
website-header-1201152.jpg
74 ms
loading.gif
64 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
162 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
184 ms
WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
236 ms
do7-0avPC2vxor6SN2THGA.ttf
237 ms
ZKwULyCG95tk6mOqHQfRBC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
238 ms
LgcV55siz7BRNdbO3Huj5g.ttf
235 ms
AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
237 ms
Genericons.svg
60 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
8 ms
Noticons.svg
91 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
7 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
88 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
88 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
155 ms
website-header-1201152.jpg
176 ms
share
209 ms
g.gif
111 ms
share
209 ms
g.gif
104 ms
tomasacker.com
200 ms
g.gif
73 ms
g.gif
74 ms
g.gif
72 ms
global-print.css
32 ms
c5fMqbDbbL59v59QdFI3keoBO0_7RdlfGxVIqA3iOsMff5LBggMdeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
28 ms
HO6yNTMduJOe7a6u5IrlXcSaD9kjXBq_JwrR1AxLR7JffwefggMdeMJ6Mk6f5MX.woff
54 ms
YviiEg3MrsjOJBiqC36WJEtULZ_KliGl08g33MhDSsjffJnjMUMdeMJ6Mk6f5gI.woff
87 ms
fkRT48Y3kqvUf27HgEVkPSWr3bkw3mTia2V_yjZRj7JffVEgggMdeMJ6Mk6f5Mw.woff
113 ms
NoBsE1IXnHusNlVhUBY7hsahGC2LxI1yXHDWoQOOqdjffVruggMdeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
140 ms
tomasacker.com accessibility score
tomasacker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tomasacker.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tomasacker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tomasacker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tomasacker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tom ASACKER. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: