30.5 sec in total
11.6 sec
18.8 sec
122 ms
Welcome to tomfaber.com homepage info - get ready to check Tom Faber best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about tomfaber.com
Visit tomfaber.comWe analyzed Tomfaber.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11.6 sec and then it took 18.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
tomfaber.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value920 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.396
26/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
11613 ms
6609 ms
92 ms
154 ms
188 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Tomfaber.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Tomfaber.com.
Page size can be reduced by 159.8 kB (53%)
298.9 kB
139.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Tomfaber.com main page is 298.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 177.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tom Faber images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 117.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tomfaber.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (78%)
18
4
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tom Faber. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tomfaber.com
11613 ms
www.tomfaber.com
6609 ms
style.css
92 ms
style-Black.css
154 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
188 ms
page_templates.css
165 ms
styles.css
176 ms
jquery.js
257 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
177 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
235 ms
superfish.js
283 ms
custom.js
285 ms
jquery.form.min.js
284 ms
scripts.js
283 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
311 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
334 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
332 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
288 ms
bg_home.jpg
310 ms
bottom-light-bg.png
113 ms
tomfaber.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
tomfaber.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tomfaber.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tomfaber.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tomfaber.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tomfaber.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tom Faber. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: