4.1 sec in total
474 ms
3.2 sec
461 ms
Welcome to tomjohnson.co homepage info - get ready to check Tom Johnson best content right away, or after learning these important things about tomjohnson.co
Advertising, copywriting and design portfolio of Nashville-based Creative Director – Tom Johnson
Visit tomjohnson.coWe analyzed Tomjohnson.co page load time and found that the first response time was 474 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
tomjohnson.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value17.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.9 s
4/100
10%
Value3,180 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.776
5/100
15%
Value16.6 s
5/100
10%
474 ms
286 ms
765 ms
763 ms
762 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Tomjohnson.co, 43% (15 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 20% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 134.7 kB (14%)
997.4 kB
862.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Tomjohnson.co main page is 997.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 818.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 134.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 285 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tom Johnson images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 157 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (25%)
28
21
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tom Johnson. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.tomjohnson.co
474 ms
uPSYV_9MMEw_r6hF5XMzxRYItxeDvpJTOee9q454bNSfeT9ffFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWDmqZewhwebtZAsRFQyqFDMXjhbUZcZ8Fs7jMPG0jcmCdfucdeBXihNkdPulSDmCO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUKZAUCOAZCjWsada4lOAuDFA30SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUXdhu7dhy0ShN0OcFzOYiaikoKZAUCOAZCjWsada4lOAuDFA30SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOYiaikoXdhu7dhy0ShN0OcFzJ6TnZWgCZWJlSasqH6qJq9XbMg62JMJ7fbKFQsMMeMb6MKG4f44FIMMjgPMfH6qJRXXbMg6YJMJ7fbKJSyMMeMX6MKG4f4gFIMMjIPMfqMYdToazgb.js
286 ms
common-vendors-c563fb79948999a89a36d-min.en-US.js
765 ms
common-96f024e5ffdd31a2223e6-min.en-US.js
763 ms
performance-ea2ccd862828388f851b5-min.en-US.js
762 ms
site.css
418 ms
site-bundle.js
651 ms
site-common.js
650 ms
analytics.js
1283 ms
d
1117 ms
d
1400 ms
d
1399 ms
d
1401 ms
settings
843 ms
legacy-async-intersection-observer-c1f72be75ae7957a54557-min.en-US.js
293 ms
RecordHit
480 ms
d
186 ms
d
185 ms
zoobrochureshortlimage.jpg
352 ms
collect
85 ms
ascendwebistetallimage.jpg
235 ms
ascendbuskertallimage.jpg
231 ms
amsurgpostershortlimage.jpg
232 ms
ascendrebrandshortlimage.jpg
156 ms
fifthandbroadtallimage.jpg
233 ms
zooairporttallimage.jpg
256 ms
energylogicshortlimage.jpg
296 ms
mountcarmelbariatricshortlimage.jpg
268 ms
rwjeatingtallimage.jpg
304 ms
caseyjonestallimage.jpg
318 ms
retouchestallimage.jpg
320 ms
ascenddebitshortlimage.jpg
364 ms
amsurgbuttonshortlimage.jpg
396 ms
p.gif
141 ms
sitelogo.jpg
385 ms
tomjohnson.co accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
tomjohnson.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tomjohnson.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tomjohnson.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tomjohnson.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tomjohnson.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tom Johnson. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: