Tools & Wizards About Us
tomsawyerdiner.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

tomsawyerdiner.com

Tom Sawyer Diner

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

90 ms

tomsawyerdiner.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tom Sawyer Diner content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tomsawyerdiner.com

Best Diner in Town

Visit tomsawyerdiner.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tomsawyerdiner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tomsawyerdiner.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.087

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.tomsawyerdiner.com

174 ms

minified.js

90 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

176 ms

polyfill.min.js

187 ms

thunderbolt-commons.83c93ab6.bundle.min.js

150 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tomsawyerdiner.com, 32% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (11 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (515 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 339.1 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

816.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Tomsawyerdiner.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 463.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 334.8 kB

  • Original 431.9 kB
  • After minification 430.1 kB
  • After compression 97.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 334.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 463.0 kB
  • After minification 463.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tom Sawyer Diner images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 260.5 kB
  • After minification 260.4 kB
  • After compression 256.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (40%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tom Sawyer Diner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.tomsawyerdiner.com

www.tomsawyerdiner.com

174 ms

minified.js

minified.js

90 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

176 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

187 ms

thunderbolt-commons.83c93ab6.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.83c93ab6.bundle.min.js

150 ms

main.322bbfd8.bundle.min.js

main.322bbfd8.bundle.min.js

153 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

149 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

154 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

150 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

154 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

153 ms

4f9672_680cd4f2157c47e4bf47d77823f308fbf000.jpg

4f9672_680cd4f2157c47e4bf47d77823f308fbf000.jpg

515 ms

DD.png

DD.png

308 ms

1_edited_edited.jpg

1_edited_edited.jpg

140 ms

4f9672_9bfadf2acff34904b376a908151144b5~mv2.jpg

4f9672_9bfadf2acff34904b376a908151144b5~mv2.jpg

140 ms

4f9672_2515d495eefb4e98a9698dd6cacc3831~mv2.jpg

4f9672_2515d495eefb4e98a9698dd6cacc3831~mv2.jpg

138 ms

4f9672_66d5ef04c8af48078820aaf93ebef52b~mv2.jpg

4f9672_66d5ef04c8af48078820aaf93ebef52b~mv2.jpg

138 ms

4f9672_f472b929a0844e22a7c2ff1fe7587f24~mv2.jpg

4f9672_f472b929a0844e22a7c2ff1fe7587f24~mv2.jpg

157 ms

4f9672_5f0326a09b964eb19fa94f882826c7a6~mv2.jpg

4f9672_5f0326a09b964eb19fa94f882826c7a6~mv2.jpg

156 ms

4f9672_60c8b60dd77f4c4eb20f2e5a620c035d~mv2.jpg

4f9672_60c8b60dd77f4c4eb20f2e5a620c035d~mv2.jpg

157 ms

DD.png

DD.png

336 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

109 ms

142 ms

124 ms

125 ms

125 ms

125 ms

125 ms

166 ms

159 ms

160 ms

157 ms

160 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

37 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

13 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

10 ms

Accessibility Review

tomsawyerdiner.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

tomsawyerdiner.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tomsawyerdiner.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tomsawyerdiner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tomsawyerdiner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tomsawyerdiner.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tom Sawyer Diner. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: