Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

toolsresearch.com

Diamond Wire Cutting Solution - Diamond Wire Loop/ Wire Saw Machine

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

110 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

548 ms

toolsresearch.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Toolsresearch content for Indonesia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about toolsresearch.com

diamond wire cutting is a new cutting method,with diamond wire loop and diamond wire sawing machine,the cutting quality and speed can be highly improved.

Visit toolsresearch.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Toolsresearch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

toolsresearch.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,690 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.163

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.4 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

toolsresearch.com

110 ms

www.toolsresearch.com

118 ms

autoptimize_d4c9cac038f6f9dff578986db9f42928.css

490 ms

dashicons.min.css

98 ms

autoptimize_single_36ea4805809e6b690c2f5126a0808297.css

115 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Toolsresearch.com, 19% (12 requests) were made to I2.wp.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 410.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Toolsresearch.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 146.0 kB

  • Original 166.4 kB
  • After minification 166.3 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Toolsresearch images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 261 B

  • Original 276.6 kB
  • After minification 276.6 kB
  • After compression 276.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 232.7 kB

  • Original 265.9 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Toolsresearch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 232.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (23%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Toolsresearch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

toolsresearch.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

toolsresearch.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

toolsresearch.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Toolsresearch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Toolsresearch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Toolsresearch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: