4.6 sec in total
183 ms
3.7 sec
720 ms
Visit tosack.com now to see the best up-to-date Tosack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tosack.com
Visit tosack.comWe analyzed Tosack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
tosack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.165
71/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
183 ms
1926 ms
399 ms
163 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Tosack.com, 16% (17 requests) were made to Gbcinternetenforcement.net and 4% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Tosack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 675.1 kB (46%)
1.5 MB
782.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Tosack.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 747.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.1 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tosack needs image optimization as it can save up to 120.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 358.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 358.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tosack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (30%)
99
69
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tosack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tosack.com
183 ms
www.tosack.com
1926 ms
styles.css
399 ms
widgets.css
163 ms
style.css
163 ms
prototype.js
412 ms
ccard.js
162 ms
validation.js
233 ms
builder.js
241 ms
effects.js
429 ms
dragdrop.js
429 ms
controls.js
312 ms
slider.js
319 ms
js.js
391 ms
form.js
437 ms
menu.js
471 ms
translate.js
475 ms
cookies.js
477 ms
scripts.js
476 ms
ga.js
23 ms
logo.gif
86 ms
nav_searchbar_submit.gif
87 ms
slider1.jpg
565 ms
slider2.jpg
563 ms
slider3.jpg
403 ms
slider4.jpg
550 ms
slider5.jpg
237 ms
right-banner.jpg
401 ms
dc100-3.jpg
317 ms
mp110-1.jpg
401 ms
dc106-1.jpg
523 ms
dc103-1.jpg
549 ms
mp112-1.jpg
550 ms
mp103-1.jpg
556 ms
mp106-1.jpg
557 ms
mp115-1.jpg
561 ms
mp117-1_1.jpg
562 ms
mp101-1.jpg
633 ms
mp108-1.jpg
634 ms
mp119-1.jpg
635 ms
cem180-1.jpg
635 ms
cemddt8.jpg
636 ms
cemc91-1.jpg
637 ms
cemx2203g-1.jpg
712 ms
cem705-1.jpg
712 ms
cemskx4.jpg
713 ms
cem8650705-1.jpg
714 ms
55820s-1.jpg
715 ms
80230s-1.jpg
714 ms
56182s-1_1.jpg
789 ms
80352s-1.jpg
789 ms
80501s-1.jpg
791 ms
cemx230-1.jpg
792 ms
cemm7s.jpg
793 ms
cem8650706-2_1.jpg
793 ms
www.rbvipsnew.com
386 ms
80350s-1.jpg
857 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
__utm.gif
6 ms
80355s-1.jpg
792 ms
56315s-1.jpg
787 ms
55868s-1.jpg
643 ms
80013s-1.jpg
564 ms
16-487.gbcinternetenforcement.net
20 ms
slt.jpg
480 ms
4.png
553 ms
1.png
553 ms
16-487
29 ms
style.css
6 ms
menu.css
7 ms
blog.css
8 ms
css
24 ms
jquery.js
8 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
10 ms
vslider.js
8 ms
external-tracking.min.js
10 ms
css
81 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
9 ms
superfish.js
10 ms
superfish_settings.js.php
10 ms
atrk.js
81 ms
gbc-logo.png
759 ms
TEMPWarningBanner.png
66 ms
RayBanButton.png
63 ms
OakleyButton.png
66 ms
GreenButton2.png
65 ms
__utm.gif
55 ms
gbc-footer-bg.gif
40 ms
footerimage.png
12 ms
5.png
410 ms
3.png
409 ms
abbydressLogo.jpg
409 ms
payment.gif
409 ms
K6ngFdK5haaaRGBV8waDwA.ttf
11 ms
187TYb8ysVvxar86IcDsZ_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
17 ms
TNtGAwzXtCEY_5hzRlIJNPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
17 ms
nHiQo1BypvYzt95zlPq1TvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
18 ms
bai.jpg
474 ms
sprite_repeat.gif
475 ms
sprite.gif
476 ms
slide-arrow.gif
475 ms
bkg_btn.gif
475 ms
bkg_rating.gif
477 ms
atrk.gif
31 ms
test.png
53 ms
print.css
81 ms
tosack.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tosack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
tosack.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tosack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tosack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tosack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tosack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: