Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

totalwallcovering.com

Discount Wallpaper with Free Shipping| Total Wallcovering Inc.

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

302 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

totalwallcovering.com screenshot

About Website

Visit totalwallcovering.com now to see the best up-to-date Total Wallcovering content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about totalwallcovering.com

Check out our extensive collection of discount wallpaper including Thibaut Wallpaper. Find the perfect creative solution for your decorative needs.

Visit totalwallcovering.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Totalwallcovering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 302 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

totalwallcovering.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value51,890 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.119

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value64.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

totalwallcovering.com

302 ms

bootstrap.min.css

111 ms

wallcovering-style.css

90 ms

wallcovering-responsive.css

76 ms

colorbox.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Totalwallcovering.com, 52% (41 requests) were made to Twcimages.blob.core.windows.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (917 ms) relates to the external source Twcimages.blob.core.windows.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 639.0 kB (28%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Totalwallcovering.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 43.5 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 35.7 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.3 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 52.2 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Total Wallcovering images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 218.9 kB

  • Original 364.1 kB
  • After minification 357.1 kB
  • After compression 145.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 218.9 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 324.4 kB

  • Original 390.4 kB
  • After minification 381.9 kB
  • After compression 66.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Totalwallcovering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 324.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (18%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

60

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Total Wallcovering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

totalwallcovering.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

totalwallcovering.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

totalwallcovering.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Totalwallcovering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Totalwallcovering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Total Wallcovering. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: