Tools & Wizards About Us
touristclick.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

touristclick.com

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

341 ms

Resources Loaded

615 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

touristclick.com screenshot

About Website

Visit touristclick.com now to see the best up-to-date Touristclick content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about touristclick.com

A Comprehensive worldwide travel directory, Find a travel service, hotel booking directly with a hotel owner web site, car rent with a local services around the world

Visit touristclick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Touristclick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 740 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

touristclick.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

touristclick.com

341 ms

tour.css

64 ms

adsbygoogle.js

6 ms

ca-pub-5203440214253917.js

119 ms

zrt_lookup.html

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Touristclick.com, 12% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (341 ms) belongs to the original domain Touristclick.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.0 kB (34%)

Content Size

152.6 kB

After Optimization

100.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Touristclick.com main page is 152.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 62.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 45.1 kB

  • Original 52.3 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.6 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 707 B

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Touristclick images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 139 B

  • Original 62.3 kB
  • After minification 62.3 kB
  • After compression 62.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 788 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Touristclick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (72%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Touristclick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

touristclick.com

touristclick.com

341 ms

tour.css

tour.css

64 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

6 ms

ca-pub-5203440214253917.js

ca-pub-5203440214253917.js

119 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

46 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

54 ms

head.jpg

head.jpg

94 ms

space.gif

space.gif

37 ms

leftmanu.gif

leftmanu.gif

94 ms

manubar.gif

manubar.gif

95 ms

coner.gif

coner.gif

94 ms

consolidat.gif

consolidat.gif

95 ms

3px.gif

3px.gif

94 ms

guides.gif

guides.gif

102 ms

lodging.gif

lodging.gif

109 ms

prepar.gif

prepar.gif

109 ms

plublic.gif

plublic.gif

110 ms

special.gif

special.gif

109 ms

transport.gif

transport.gif

110 ms

insure.gif

insure.gif

138 ms

tour.gif

tour.gif

139 ms

im.gif

im.gif

141 ms

worldmap.gif

worldmap.gif

211 ms

lefttop.jpg

lefttop.jpg

142 ms

centertop.jpg

centertop.jpg

144 ms

righttop.jpg

righttop.jpg

168 ms

reic.gif

reic.gif

171 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

174 ms

conerend.gif

conerend.gif

175 ms

endmanu.gif

endmanu.gif

176 ms

rbg.gif

rbg.gif

201 ms

ads

ads

23 ms

osd.js

osd.js

8 ms

Accessibility Review

touristclick.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

touristclick.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

touristclick.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Touristclick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Touristclick.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

touristclick.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Touristclick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: