3.3 sec in total
682 ms
2.3 sec
305 ms
Click here to check amazing Trackcompa Re content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trackcompare.co.uk
We are experts in helping businesses to lower the costs, improve safety standards and increase productivity of their fleet of vans, trucks and cars
Visit trackcompare.co.ukWe analyzed Trackcompare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 682 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
trackcompare.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.104
89/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
682 ms
650 ms
82 ms
239 ms
161 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Trackcompare.co.uk, 4% (2 requests) were made to T.wowanalytics.co.uk and 4% (2 requests) were made to Storage.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (682 ms) belongs to the original domain Trackcompare.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 455.0 kB (46%)
982.0 kB
527.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Trackcompare.co.uk main page is 982.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 387.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.6 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trackcompa Re images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 192.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 192.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 191.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trackcompare.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 191.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (40%)
42
25
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trackcompa Re. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
trackcompare.co.uk
682 ms
www.trackcompare.co.uk
650 ms
font-awesome.min.css
82 ms
foundation.min.css
239 ms
normalize.css
161 ms
foundation-icons.css
157 ms
style.css
164 ms
custom.css
162 ms
jquery.js
250 ms
modernizr.js
235 ms
foundation.min.js
358 ms
wp-embed.min.js
236 ms
conversion.js
19 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
147 ms
tracker.js
450 ms
single-sprinter.png
561 ms
Track-Compare-Logo.png
165 ms
van-tracking-long.png
166 ms
fuel-cards-montage-long.png
166 ms
novus.jpg
164 ms
svc1080.jpg
164 ms
novus-silver-150.jpg
166 ms
multi.jpg
397 ms
video-frame.jpg
418 ms
video-frame2.jpg
417 ms
video-frame31.jpg
417 ms
shutterstock_158565818-150x150.jpg
417 ms
crashed_car-150x150.jpg
416 ms
oil_production-150x150.jpg
482 ms
Google_Car-150x150.jpg
480 ms
texting_and_driving1-125x125.jpg
477 ms
motorway-150x150.gif
476 ms
footer-logo.png
473 ms
chat.png
552 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
606 ms
c2bb3ff8-39d0-4d20-a398-2ecbee363ea0.js
372 ms
analytics.js
224 ms
who.js
388 ms
242 ms
0107.js
41 ms
collect
16 ms
34 ms
163 ms
collect
58 ms
blank.gif
11 ms
ServiceGetConfig
163 ms
who.ashx
98 ms
trackcompare.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
trackcompare.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
trackcompare.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trackcompare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trackcompare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
trackcompare.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trackcompa Re. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: