8.4 sec in total
1.7 sec
6 sec
607 ms
Visit trackglobe.com now to see the best up-to-date TRACKGLOBE content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trackglobe.com
Trackglobe Desarrollo web, Ecommerce, plataformas online
Visit trackglobe.comWe analyzed Trackglobe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
trackglobe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value4,120 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value16.2 s
5/100
10%
1749 ms
339 ms
362 ms
242 ms
1135 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Trackglobe.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Trackglobe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (60%)
3.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Trackglobe.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 121.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TRACKGLOBE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 681.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 681.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trackglobe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (58%)
91
38
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TRACKGLOBE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.trackglobe.com
1749 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
339 ms
dashicons.min.css
362 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
242 ms
styles.css
1135 ms
cli-style.css
243 ms
settings.css
1155 ms
css
23 ms
js_composer.min.css
688 ms
us-base.css
364 ms
font-awesome.css
461 ms
font-mdfi.css
491 ms
magnific-popup.css
485 ms
style.css
744 ms
responsive.css
608 ms
style.css
611 ms
Defaults.css
761 ms
ultimate.min.css
1073 ms
jquery.js
1106 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
866 ms
jquery.form.min.js
985 ms
scripts.js
985 ms
cookielawinfo.js
1106 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1420 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1311 ms
wpcf7.js
1191 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
1223 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
1246 ms
custom.min.js
1398 ms
css
24 ms
css
23 ms
api.js
38 ms
owl.carousel.css
1225 ms
core.min.js
1276 ms
widget.min.js
1280 ms
mouse.min.js
1373 ms
resizable.min.js
1378 ms
draggable.min.js
1518 ms
button.min.js
1427 ms
position.min.js
1459 ms
dialog.min.js
1458 ms
wpdialog.min.js
1363 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1361 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
1399 ms
jquery.simpleplaceholder.js
1304 ms
imagesloaded.js
1300 ms
us.core.js
1336 ms
us.widgets.js
1328 ms
us.theme.js
1231 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1177 ms
info-box.min.js
1172 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1104 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1095 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1143 ms
FuturaPTWeb-Book.woff
1014 ms
T_blanco.png
658 ms
dummy.png
658 ms
all1-1024x640.jpg
757 ms
facebook-3-350x350.jpg
663 ms
spotify-350x225.jpg
659 ms
windows-350x350.jpg
660 ms
cmmi-300x223.png
661 ms
Microsoft-300x223.png
684 ms
Aenor-300x223.png
695 ms
wordpress-300x223.png
709 ms
prestashop-300x223.png
868 ms
net-300x223.png
804 ms
sharepoint-300x223.png
813 ms
Office-365-300x223.png
819 ms
camaras-300x223.png
1011 ms
T_verde.png
924 ms
logo_white.svg
932 ms
nos-1024x683.jpg
982 ms
integracion-1024x383.jpg
1144 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1049 ms
FuturaPTWeb-Demi.woff
1173 ms
mdfonticon.woff
1289 ms
Defaults.woff
1290 ms
recaptcha__en.js
78 ms
collect
13 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
620 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
715 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
740 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
760 ms
overlay.png
960 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIiZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
21 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
43 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
44 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
43 ms
OLffGBTaF0XFOW1gnuHF0SwlidHJgAgmTjOEEzwu1L8.ttf
58 ms
W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEXYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
59 ms
t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcCywlidHJgAgmTjOEEzwu1L8.ttf
58 ms
coloredbg.png
188 ms
mountain.jpeg
361 ms
bbs_big_green.png
186 ms
shop1.jpeg
478 ms
revicons.woff
186 ms
mac.jpg
239 ms
trackglobe.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
trackglobe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
trackglobe.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trackglobe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trackglobe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
trackglobe.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TRACKGLOBE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: