2.5 sec in total
334 ms
1.8 sec
377 ms
Visit tradegaze.com now to see the best up-to-date Trade Gaze content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tradegaze.com
The smart way to survey for the trade
Visit tradegaze.comWe analyzed Tradegaze.com page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
tradegaze.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.2 s
0/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value1,130 ms
23/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
334 ms
358 ms
132 ms
232 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Tradegaze.com, 28% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 17% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (503 ms) belongs to the original domain Tradegaze.com.
Page size can be reduced by 705.1 kB (49%)
1.4 MB
735.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Tradegaze.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 602.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trade Gaze images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 184.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.8 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 512.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tradegaze.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 512.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (65%)
23
8
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trade Gaze. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tradegaze.com
334 ms
tradegaze.com
358 ms
register
132 ms
all.min.css
232 ms
css
55 ms
css
70 ms
sb-admin-2.min.css
503 ms
ypRxvlu9AMg
155 ms
jquery.min.js
491 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
491 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
465 ms
sb-admin-2.min.js
464 ms
js
95 ms
tg_logo_trans_sm.png
465 ms
tg_logo_tag_sm.png
465 ms
www-player.css
9 ms
www-embed-player.js
41 ms
base.js
84 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
63 ms
ad_status.js
129 ms
mSp3U9l-INQ8zgil2b5R5d6tn3Jbttl0KpPyUXLighs.js
204 ms
embed.js
72 ms
brickbackground1.jpeg
415 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
102 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
111 ms
id
41 ms
XRXV3I6Li01BKofINeaE.ttf
68 ms
XRXW3I6Li01BKofAnsSUYevN.ttf
67 ms
XRXW3I6Li01BKofA-seUYevN.ttf
68 ms
XRXW3I6Li01BKofA6sKUYevN.ttf
67 ms
XRXW3I6Li01BKofAjsOUYevN.ttf
67 ms
XRXW3I6Li01BKofAksCUYevN.ttf
68 ms
XRXW3I6Li01BKofAtsGUYevN.ttf
77 ms
SLXHc1jY5nQ8FUUGbg.ttf
77 ms
analytics.js
44 ms
collect
11 ms
tradegaze.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
tradegaze.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tradegaze.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tradegaze.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tradegaze.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tradegaze.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trade Gaze. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: