1.4 sec in total
292 ms
976 ms
144 ms
Click here to check amazing Trashmail content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trashmail.ws
Hide your real email address for privacy and anonymity. Get rid of unwanted advertising, spam and malware.
Visit trashmail.wsWe analyzed Trashmail.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 292 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
trashmail.ws performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value2.2 s
95/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.389
26/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
292 ms
43 ms
197 ms
6 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Trashmail.ws, 15% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (308 ms) relates to the external source Analytics.yourdomain.website.
Page size can be reduced by 301.0 kB (62%)
488.6 kB
187.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Trashmail.ws main page is 488.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 414.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trashmail needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 259.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 259.0 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trashmail.ws needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (38%)
24
15
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trashmail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
trashmail.ws
292 ms
style.css
43 ms
index.php
197 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
addthis_widget.js
14 ms
zrt_lookup.html
23 ms
show_ads_impl.js
48 ms
logo.png
47 ms
trashmail.ws
153 ms
trashmail.ws
155 ms
trashmail.ws
154 ms
throbber.gif
152 ms
ads
171 ms
osd.js
75 ms
piwik.js
308 ms
300lo.json
41 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
24 ms
css
65 ms
m_js_controller.js
39 ms
abg.js
41 ms
favicon
45 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
30 ms
s
16 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
33 ms
x_button_blue2.png
7 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
3 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
trashmail.ws accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
trashmail.ws best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
trashmail.ws SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trashmail.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Trashmail.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
trashmail.ws
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trashmail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: