2 sec in total
272 ms
1.5 sec
196 ms
Welcome to travelbanter.com homepage info - get ready to check Travel Banter best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about travelbanter.com
TravelBanter.com is a forum for exchanging travel information on an enormous variety of locations and topics. It acts as a web interface to the rec.travel newsgroups
Visit travelbanter.comWe analyzed Travelbanter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
travelbanter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value2.0 s
97/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
272 ms
10 ms
159 ms
168 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Travelbanter.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Api.viglink.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (805 ms) belongs to the original domain Travelbanter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 80.4 kB (69%)
116.1 kB
35.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Travelbanter.com main page is 116.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 62.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Travel Banter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 46.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Travelbanter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (38%)
37
23
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Travel Banter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
travelbanter.com
272 ms
cloudflare.min.js
10 ms
style-d0d7a48f-00001.css
159 ms
vbulletin_global.js
168 ms
urchin.js
19 ms
vbulletin_md5.js
202 ms
vbulletin_read_marker.js
198 ms
bag2
17 ms
bag2
260 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
mast.jpg
161 ms
navbits_start.gif
163 ms
travel5.gif
166 ms
arrow.gif
194 ms
icon1.gif
170 ms
lastpost.gif
319 ms
travel7.gif
325 ms
travel8.gif
322 ms
icon14.gif
323 ms
travel10.gif
347 ms
travel12.gif
373 ms
travel13.gif
487 ms
travel17.gif
478 ms
travel6.gif
477 ms
travel9.gif
479 ms
travel11.gif
510 ms
travel16.gif
526 ms
travel14.gif
632 ms
travel15.gif
653 ms
forum_old.gif
651 ms
whos_online.gif
649 ms
stats.gif
671 ms
feed_icon.gif
688 ms
cron.php
805 ms
pixel.gif
9 ms
pixel.gif
8 ms
ping
18 ms
optimize
52 ms
cse
288 ms
domains
9 ms
travelbanter.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[accesskey] values are not unique
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
travelbanter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
travelbanter.com SEO score
N/A
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Travelbanter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Travelbanter.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
travelbanter.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Travel Banter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: