7.5 sec in total
412 ms
5.5 sec
1.6 sec
Visit traversia.net now to see the best up-to-date Traversia content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about traversia.net
Driving travel tech innovations for TMCs, B2B Resellers & Corporates.
Visit traversia.netWe analyzed Traversia.net page load time and found that the first response time was 412 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
traversia.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.255
48/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
412 ms
1473 ms
888 ms
44 ms
889 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (97 requests) were addressed to the original Traversia.net, 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Traversia.net.
Page size can be reduced by 418.0 kB (35%)
1.2 MB
785.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Traversia.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 457.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 365.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 365.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Traversia needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 190 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Traversia.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (48%)
56
29
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Traversia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
traversia.net
412 ms
traversia.net
1473 ms
ionicons.min.css
888 ms
font-awesome.min.css
44 ms
animate.css
889 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
890 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
898 ms
style.css
901 ms
scroll-baar.css
920 ms
navigation_css.css
1091 ms
jquery.min.js
59 ms
lottie-player.js
55 ms
lottie-player.js
37 ms
jquery.min.js
43 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
679 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
681 ms
jquery-migrate-3.3.2.min.js
694 ms
modernizr-3.11.2.min.js
701 ms
jquery.waypoints.js
719 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
880 ms
global.js
882 ms
wow.min.js
883 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
898 ms
tippy.min.js
901 ms
mailchimp-ajax.js
936 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
1081 ms
jquery.counterup.js
1085 ms
main.js
1142 ms
nav_js.js
1149 ms
js
90 ms
ionicons.min.css
212 ms
animate.css
420 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
685 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
687 ms
style.css
1022 ms
scroll-baar.css
667 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
710 ms
navigation_css.css
443 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
866 ms
jquery-migrate-3.3.2.min.js
672 ms
modernizr-3.11.2.min.js
672 ms
jquery.waypoints.js
661 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
751 ms
global.js
749 ms
wow.min.js
748 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
938 ms
tippy.min.js
825 ms
mailchimp-ajax.js
813 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
890 ms
jquery.counterup.js
716 ms
main.js
665 ms
nav_js.js
769 ms
css2
51 ms
gtm.js
63 ms
dark.png
225 ms
dark.png
369 ms
phone.png
219 ms
mail.png
220 ms
Mobile-App-Development.png
219 ms
Web-Development.png
218 ms
Social-Media-Marketing.png
220 ms
ecommercedevelopment.png
427 ms
Website-Designing.png
418 ms
brand-logo1.jpg
416 ms
brand-logo2.jpg
423 ms
brand-logo3.jpg
423 ms
brand-logo4.jpg
427 ms
brand-logo5.jpg
693 ms
brand-logo6.jpg
633 ms
brand-logo7.jpg
639 ms
brand-logo8.jpg
639 ms
brand-logo9.jpg
691 ms
brand-logo10.jpg
693 ms
brand-logo11.jpg
835 ms
brand-logo12.jpg
842 ms
brand-logo13.jpg
845 ms
avter.png
891 ms
white.png
888 ms
font
128 ms
font
168 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
34 ms
ionicons28b5.ttf
900 ms
phone.png
236 ms
Mobile-App-Development.png
263 ms
Web-Development.png
343 ms
mail.png
361 ms
Social-Media-Marketing.png
367 ms
dark.png
426 ms
brand-logo1.jpg
266 ms
Website-Designing.png
314 ms
plane-data.png
560 ms
1-1-1920x454.png
490 ms
brand-logo3.jpg
364 ms
brand-logo2.jpg
429 ms
ecommercedevelopment.png
465 ms
brand-logo4.jpg
504 ms
brand-logo6.jpg
350 ms
brand-logo7.jpg
422 ms
brand-logo8.jpg
461 ms
brand-logo9.jpg
444 ms
brand-logo5.jpg
489 ms
brand-logo10.jpg
486 ms
brand-logo11.jpg
409 ms
brand-logo12.jpg
423 ms
brand-logo13.jpg
468 ms
white.png
440 ms
avter.png
488 ms
1-1-1920x454.png
1088 ms
traversia.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
traversia.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
traversia.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Traversia.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Traversia.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
traversia.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Traversia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: