Tools & Wizards About Us
trio-vision.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

trio-vision.com

Trio-Vision.com

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

24 ms

Resources Loaded

808 ms

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

trio-vision.com screenshot

About Website

Visit trio-vision.com now to see the best up-to-date Trio Vision content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trio-vision.com

Visit trio-vision.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Trio-vision.com page load time and found that the first response time was 24 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trio-vision.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trio-vision.com

24 ms

trio-vision.com

57 ms

styles.css

11 ms

sbttb-fonts.css

19 ms

smooth-back-to-top-button.css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Trio-vision.com, 23% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (424 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 169.9 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trio-vision.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 601.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 145.4 kB

  • Original 179.9 kB
  • After minification 175.1 kB
  • After compression 34.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 601.8 kB
  • After minification 597.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trio Vision images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 390.5 kB
  • After minification 390.5 kB
  • After compression 387.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 266.8 kB
  • After minification 266.8 kB
  • After compression 249.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trio-vision.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (91%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trio Vision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

trio-vision.com

trio-vision.com

24 ms

trio-vision.com

trio-vision.com

57 ms

styles.css

styles.css

11 ms

sbttb-fonts.css

sbttb-fonts.css

19 ms

smooth-back-to-top-button.css

smooth-back-to-top-button.css

25 ms

themesky.css

themesky.css

27 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

30 ms

map.css

map.css

31 ms

custom-frontend-lite.min.css

custom-frontend-lite.min.css

41 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

32 ms

eael-5116.css

eael-5116.css

33 ms

eael-5122.css

eael-5122.css

34 ms

eael-1023.css

eael-1023.css

36 ms

post-5069.css

post-5069.css

38 ms

custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css

custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css

54 ms

uael-frontend.min.css

uael-frontend.min.css

61 ms

post-1023.css

post-1023.css

54 ms

post-5116.css

post-5116.css

55 ms

post-5122.css

post-5122.css

56 ms

betterdocs-el-edit.css

betterdocs-el-edit.css

57 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

85 ms

linearicons.min.css

linearicons.min.css

86 ms

reset.css

reset.css

87 ms

style.css

style.css

90 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

106 ms

druco.css

druco.css

109 ms

css

css

37 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

124 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

120 ms

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

121 ms

custom-widget-icon-list.min.css

custom-widget-icon-list.min.css

122 ms

custom-widget-icon-box.min.css

custom-widget-icon-box.min.css

121 ms

css

css

33 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

120 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

121 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

251 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

252 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

253 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

252 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

253 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

252 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

244 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

238 ms

index.js

index.js

234 ms

index.js

index.js

232 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

233 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

307 ms

smooth-back-to-top-button.js

smooth-back-to-top-button.js

306 ms

themesky.js

themesky.js

306 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

304 ms

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

303 ms

css

css

19 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

297 ms

eael-5116.js

eael-5116.js

289 ms

eael-5122.js

eael-5122.js

287 ms

editor.js

editor.js

286 ms

main.js

main.js

284 ms

SmoothScroll.min.js

SmoothScroll.min.js

260 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

258 ms

uael-nav-menu.min.js

uael-nav-menu.min.js

255 ms

jquery_resize.min.js

jquery_resize.min.js

239 ms

js_cookie.min.js

js_cookie.min.js

238 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

226 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

226 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

226 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

227 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

225 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

225 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

225 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

98 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

98 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

97 ms

LurksHeader-1030x483-1-1024x480.jpg

LurksHeader-1030x483-1-1024x480.jpg

98 ms

I-I-Header_2.jpg

I-I-Header_2.jpg

299 ms

II-Issues-Solutions-Header-1030x470-1-1024x467.jpg

II-Issues-Solutions-Header-1030x470-1-1024x467.jpg

165 ms

Detecting-II-Issues-Header-1030x470-1-1024x467.jpg

Detecting-II-Issues-Header-1030x470-1-1024x467.jpg

103 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7wnU6AFw.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7wnU6AFw.woff

295 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7wnU6AF7xm.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7wnU6AF7xm.woff

296 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfA7wnU6AF7xm.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfA7wnU6AF7xm.woff

294 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcw7wnU6AF7xm.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcw7wnU6AF7xm.woff

296 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKew7wnU6AF7xm.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKew7wnU6AF7xm.woff

297 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcg7wnU6AF7xm.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcg7wnU6AF7xm.woff

296 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyLPYZvgw.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyLPYZvgw.woff

297 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jvmyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jvmyLPYZvg7UI.woff

424 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3js2yLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3js2yLPYZvg7UI.woff

423 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jvGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jvGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

423 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jtGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jtGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

423 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jvWyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jvWyLPYZvg7UI.woff

336 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyLPYZvgw.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyLPYZvgw.woff

298 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjvmyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjvmyLPYZvg7UI.woff

297 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1Czjs2yLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1Czjs2yLPYZvg7UI.woff

331 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjvGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjvGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

332 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjtGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjtGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

332 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjvWyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjvWyLPYZvg7UI.woff

333 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyLPYZvgw.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyLPYZvgw.woff

333 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyLPYZvg7UI.woff

334 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjs2yLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjs2yLPYZvg7UI.woff

333 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

333 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjtGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjtGyLPYZvg7UI.woff

334 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvWyLPYZvg7UI.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvWyLPYZvg7UI.woff

335 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

201 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

202 ms

wpxpress.ttf

wpxpress.ttf

200 ms

Accessibility Review

trio-vision.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

trio-vision.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

trio-vision.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trio-vision.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trio-vision.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trio-vision.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trio Vision. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: