4.2 sec in total
324 ms
3.1 sec
724 ms
Visit trip.me now to see the best up-to-date Trip content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trip.me
Connecting people to reimagine travel. Tailor-made holidays crafted specially for you by our local experts in over 85 destinations worldwide!
Visit trip.meWe analyzed Trip.me page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
trip.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value1,620 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
324 ms
790 ms
30 ms
155 ms
7 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Trip.me, 32% (29 requests) were made to Photos.trip.me and 23% (21 requests) were made to Assets.trip.me. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Photos.trip.me.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (40%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Trip.me main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.7 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trip images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 776.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 776.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trip.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 154.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (33%)
78
52
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
trip.me
324 ms
www.trip.me
790 ms
css
30 ms
base.css
155 ms
font-awesome.min.css
7 ms
layout.css
159 ms
index.css
539 ms
base.js
762 ms
layout.js
147 ms
index.js
446 ms
e2e925520d76aa38.jpeg
193 ms
badge_light.png
38 ms
insolvency-security.png
145 ms
footer-facebook.png
336 ms
worldMap.png
36 ms
tooltip_arrow.png
33 ms
best-price-guaranteed.png
35 ms
secure-payment.png
35 ms
quality-agencies.png
42 ms
trusted-contact.png
41 ms
customer-reviews.png
36 ms
footer-twitter.png
38 ms
footer-googleplus.png
37 ms
footer-emirates.png
37 ms
footer-forbes.png
39 ms
footer-ecologic.png
244 ms
footer-tourcert.png
37 ms
footer-lnt.png
37 ms
aef016f5ef6f3ec3.jpeg
187 ms
8bc906a08cbddb73.jpeg
187 ms
188fc6e590d0b2be.jpeg
183 ms
16ba677da4e74edc.jpeg
187 ms
4332c9336d489472.jpeg
186 ms
32237fdd76be1378.jpeg
455 ms
0e4fb8a03d6726a0.jpeg
186 ms
db95afa3034b528e.jpeg
187 ms
e2e925520d76aa38.jpeg
359 ms
aef016f5ef6f3ec3.jpeg
456 ms
8bc906a08cbddb73.jpeg
548 ms
188fc6e590d0b2be.jpeg
559 ms
16ba677da4e74edc.jpeg
450 ms
4332c9336d489472.jpeg
554 ms
32237fdd76be1378.jpeg
554 ms
0e4fb8a03d6726a0.jpeg
652 ms
db95afa3034b528e.jpeg
663 ms
c4abceb39a5ad7ea.jpeg
650 ms
5ee18c60f10ac336.jpeg
662 ms
e4fa0e57f89dbd02.jpeg
752 ms
c066cc2ddec99c22.jpeg
663 ms
282fa096321283dc.jpeg
751 ms
1f8928cc60179c09.jpeg
753 ms
470261b29a327920.jpeg
662 ms
gtm.js
90 ms
sprites.png
69 ms
subnav.png
66 ms
worldmap_point.png
69 ms
954ba33d533554d5.jpeg
1225 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
16 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
17 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
41 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
40 ms
koFYE26bhT88HgRA8f4vbS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
41 ms
ejLRhBEorqjLDaF8s-xuTQ.ttf
40 ms
FZa_MODmDkR9DTu5jHSnSS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
41 ms
7M5kxD4eGxuhgFaIk95pBS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
41 ms
mixpanel-2.2.min.js
12 ms
analytics.js
49 ms
fbds.js
220 ms
conversion.js
47 ms
XF938DC99A2B786FA9ECFAE3E67453006.js
546 ms
tag.js
217 ms
i.js
25 ms
a4fc4507f78aeb043536a6deeeaf0ed270d8f58c.1.js
165 ms
24 ms
linkid.js
11 ms
ec.js
11 ms
collect
117 ms
collect
141 ms
808d53e1aac03bdd.jpeg
903 ms
1720e9f432c10eed.jpeg
1102 ms
a336f5fea3ff1b6c.jpeg
1000 ms
ga-audiences
36 ms
36 ms
capture-apps-4.5.0.js
21 ms
iframeStorage.html
158 ms
iframeStorage.js
52 ms
appsmanagerinit
210 ms
collect
13 ms
7 ms
trip.me accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
trip.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
trip.me SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trip.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trip.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
trip.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Trip. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: