7.4 sec in total
507 ms
6.3 sec
531 ms
Click here to check amazing Trisilco content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trisilco.com
Visit trisilco.comWe analyzed Trisilco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 507 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
trisilco.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value1,810 ms
9/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
507 ms
1451 ms
80 ms
476 ms
704 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Trisilco.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Trisilco.com.
Page size can be reduced by 394.8 kB (30%)
1.3 MB
940.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Trisilco.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 459.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 236.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 236.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trisilco needs image optimization as it can save up to 77.5 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 71.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trisilco.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.7 kB or 32% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (72%)
65
18
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trisilco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
trisilco.com
507 ms
trisilco.com
1451 ms
js
80 ms
style.min.css
476 ms
h5vp.css
704 ms
frontend.css
708 ms
content_elements.crush.css
1202 ms
slick.css
711 ms
style.css
726 ms
style.min.css
735 ms
chaty-front.min.css
937 ms
styles.css
940 ms
style.css
1418 ms
edge.css
963 ms
css
41 ms
style.css
972 ms
wpstg-admin-all-pages.min.css
1181 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
1182 ms
jquery.min.js
1469 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1280 ms
slick.min.js
1468 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1467 ms
content_elements.js
1468 ms
bt-bb-light.js
1483 ms
bold-timeline.js
1647 ms
jquery.dd.js
1663 ms
cc.main.js
1666 ms
wpstg-blank-loader.js
1676 ms
wpstg-admin-all-pages.min.js
1680 ms
js
69 ms
cht-front-script.min.js
1805 ms
index.js
1805 ms
index.js
1806 ms
page-scroll-to-id.min.js
1806 ms
fancySelect.js
1806 ms
header.misc.js
1806 ms
misc.js
1807 ms
api.js
40 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1891 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1951 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2151 ms
index.js
1951 ms
bt_bb_elements.js
1708 ms
bt_bb_floating_image.js
1546 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1643 ms
masonry.min.js
1731 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
1708 ms
bt_bb_post_grid.js
1709 ms
js
332 ms
Trisilco-logo-website-284.png
518 ms
hero_home_02.jpg
887 ms
floating_image_09.png
1158 ms
floating_image_11.png
708 ms
bottom_left_grey.png
707 ms
floating_image_10.png
954 ms
top_right_black.png
759 ms
bottom_left_dark.png
939 ms
blank.gif
946 ms
top_right_grey.png
1002 ms
bottom_right_grey.png
1121 ms
floating_image_15.png
1173 ms
floating_image_14.png
1183 ms
top_left_dark.png
1191 ms
Trisilco-logo-website-195.png
1244 ms
font
72 ms
font
201 ms
Icon7Stroke.woff
1235 ms
Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff
1274 ms
Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff
1521 ms
Essential.woff
1306 ms
FontAwesome.woff
1556 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1953 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1468 ms
recaptcha__en.js
64 ms
admin-ajax.php
1637 ms
print.css
240 ms
trisilco.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
trisilco.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
trisilco.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trisilco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trisilco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
trisilco.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trisilco. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: