6.1 sec in total
1.2 sec
4 sec
904 ms
Click here to check amazing Tryingfitness content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tryingfitness.com
Because you've tried everything else
Visit tryingfitness.comWe analyzed Tryingfitness.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
tryingfitness.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value3,440 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
1240 ms
102 ms
105 ms
56 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Tryingfitness.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Ps-us.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Tryingfitness.com.
Page size can be reduced by 490.5 kB (40%)
1.2 MB
738.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Tryingfitness.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 563.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tryingfitness images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 274.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 274.5 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tryingfitness.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 128.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (66%)
79
27
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tryingfitness. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.tryingfitness.com
1240 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
102 ms
styles.css
105 ms
css
56 ms
style.css
119 ms
tipsy.css
115 ms
wp-shortcode.css
121 ms
style.css
128 ms
jetpack.css
190 ms
jquery-ui.css
50 ms
digg-style.css
172 ms
jquery.js
319 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
176 ms
customscript.js
228 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
193 ms
wp-shortcode.js
246 ms
jquery-ui.js
59 ms
script.js
218 ms
css
47 ms
adsbygoogle.js
32 ms
counter.js
42 ms
hoolawdcom_a9ab8919-57f4-4f33-8f1b-7dedcde7522e.js
46 ms
responsive.css
249 ms
font-awesome.min.css
254 ms
jquery.form.min.js
281 ms
scripts.js
279 ms
ssba.min.js
404 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
30 ms
gprofiles.js
67 ms
wpgroho.js
399 ms
wp-embed.min.js
400 ms
e-201611.js
27 ms
4700-RIPPLE_COO_Digital_Library_300x250.jpg
574 ms
video.png
49 ms
pattern0.png
470 ms
i-salad-256x200.png
211 ms
sport-300x200.jpg
469 ms
fork-207410_640-300x200.jpg
215 ms
plateoffood-300x200.jpg
215 ms
x3kit-300x200.png
571 ms
male-muscle-300x200.jpg
469 ms
checklist-256x200.png
467 ms
omron-bp-300x200.jpg
467 ms
me-circle.png
566 ms
i-salad-70x60.png
571 ms
sport-70x60.jpg
566 ms
fork-207410_640-70x60.jpg
572 ms
plateoffood-70x60.jpg
568 ms
x3kit-70x60.png
648 ms
google.png
650 ms
twitter.png
649 ms
pinterest.png
650 ms
facebook.png
643 ms
stumbleupon.png
645 ms
reddit.png
1115 ms
email.png
1116 ms
hamburger.jpg
40 ms
propel.jpg
40 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
83 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
159 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
166 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
164 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
164 ms
ca-pub-7964645313533795.js
390 ms
zrt_lookup.html
381 ms
show_ads_impl.js
118 ms
nobg.png
451 ms
ads
724 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
116 ms
osd.js
27 ms
t.php
80 ms
analytics.js
70 ms
collect
18 ms
10JVD_humAd5zP2yrFqw6onF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
17 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
438 ms
aps-adserving.min.js
12 ms
hovercard.css
173 ms
services.css
200 ms
16320702490535585748
226 ms
abg.js
183 ms
m_js_controller.js
223 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
272 ms
ps-spr-1-mobile.png
55 ms
aps-base.min.css
76 ms
g.gif
86 ms
ps-spr-2-mobile.png
83 ms
x_button_blue2.png
78 ms
s
69 ms
tryingfitness.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
tryingfitness.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tryingfitness.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tryingfitness.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tryingfitness.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tryingfitness.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tryingfitness. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: