Tools & Wizards About Us
tuckdb.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

tuckdb.org

TuckDB Postcards - Reference guide for Tuck collectors

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

652 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

346 ms

tuckdb.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tuckdb.org homepage info - get ready to check TuckDB best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about tuckdb.org

A collection of antique postcards published by Raphael Tuck & Sons.

Visit tuckdb.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Tuckdb.org page load time and found that the first response time was 652 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tuckdb.org performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,800 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tuckdb.org

652 ms

webfont.js

22 ms

application-71fecc12eb53c7cb77d17e1ee52c9b07.css

174 ms

application-eff2607c455beee338a53c8b886ad9e5.js

416 ms

css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Tuckdb.org, 63% (15 requests) were made to Images.tuckdb.org and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (996 ms) relates to the external source Images.tuckdb.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 382.4 kB (46%)

Content Size

823.8 kB

After Optimization

441.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tuckdb.org main page is 823.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 446.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 11.8 kB
  • After minification 11.0 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 102.3 kB

  • Original 446.3 kB
  • After minification 344.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, TuckDB needs image optimization as it can save up to 102.3 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 121.9 kB

  • Original 199.6 kB
  • After minification 199.6 kB
  • After compression 77.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121.9 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 149.5 kB

  • Original 166.1 kB
  • After minification 164.6 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tuckdb.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 149.5 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TuckDB. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

tuckdb.org

tuckdb.org

652 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

22 ms

application-71fecc12eb53c7cb77d17e1ee52c9b07.css

application-71fecc12eb53c7cb77d17e1ee52c9b07.css

174 ms

application-eff2607c455beee338a53c8b886ad9e5.js

application-eff2607c455beee338a53c8b886ad9e5.js

416 ms

css

css

23 ms

5-AYViExptypIdFoLKAxTA.woff

5-AYViExptypIdFoLKAxTA.woff

6 ms

2012_01_03_10_32_54.jpg

2012_01_03_10_32_54.jpg

308 ms

20110721113031.jpg

20110721113031.jpg

306 ms

20110913130635.jpg

20110913130635.jpg

322 ms

2011_03_10_21_20_06.jpg

2011_03_10_21_20_06.jpg

220 ms

20120320113712.jpg

20120320113712.jpg

148 ms

20110126193934_000.jpg

20110126193934_000.jpg

333 ms

20120121164935.jpg

20120121164935.jpg

429 ms

20111103154245.jpg

20111103154245.jpg

596 ms

2010_08_08_10_52_23.jpg

2010_08_08_10_52_23.jpg

639 ms

2011_01_19_10_52_59.jpg

2011_01_19_10_52_59.jpg

524 ms

20110925163235.jpg

20110925163235.jpg

754 ms

20110824194235.jpg

20110824194235.jpg

560 ms

2010_12_07_14_24_29.jpg

2010_12_07_14_24_29.jpg

546 ms

20110806154815.jpg

20110806154815.jpg

996 ms

2011_01_12_13_55_17.jpg

2011_01_12_13_55_17.jpg

866 ms

sprites-a6921bd69c8b1441bd0ce720f55b5285.png

sprites-a6921bd69c8b1441bd0ce720f55b5285.png

172 ms

ga.js

ga.js

9 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

Accessibility Review

tuckdb.org accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tuckdb.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tuckdb.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuckdb.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tuckdb.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tuckdb.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TuckDB. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: