Tools & Wizards About Us
tulmar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

tulmar.com

Discover Tailored Solutions for Your Industry - Tulmar

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

173 ms

tulmar.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tulmar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tulmar.com

Welcome Discover Tailored Solutions for Your Industry Tulmar defenCe Tulmar AVIATION Tulmar CIVIL SAFETY Continue to Tulmar Tulmar defenCe Tulmar AVIATION Tulmar CIVIL SAFETY Tulmar © 2024. All rights...

Visit tulmar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tulmar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tulmar.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tulmar.com

57 ms

tulmar.com

80 ms

www.tulmar.com

1572 ms

style.min.css

39 ms

frontend.css

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Tulmar.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Tulmar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 140.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

960.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tulmar.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 476.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 100.8 kB

  • Original 122.8 kB
  • After minification 121.1 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 336.2 kB
  • After minification 336.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tulmar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 476.7 kB
  • After minification 476.7 kB
  • After compression 473.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 164.7 kB
  • After minification 164.5 kB
  • After compression 128.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tulmar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (87%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tulmar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 43 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tulmar.com

tulmar.com

57 ms

tulmar.com

tulmar.com

80 ms

www.tulmar.com

www.tulmar.com

1572 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

39 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

64 ms

trp-language-switcher.css

trp-language-switcher.css

60 ms

tulmar.css

tulmar.css

62 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

97 ms

style.css

style.css

57 ms

style.css

style.css

97 ms

blog-layouts-module.css

blog-layouts-module.css

80 ms

css

css

35 ms

jet-popup-frontend.css

jet-popup-frontend.css

71 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

88 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

78 ms

public.css

public.css

95 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

99 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

106 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

104 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

105 ms

fadeInDown.min.css

fadeInDown.min.css

113 ms

fadeIn.min.css

fadeIn.min.css

112 ms

custom-jet-blocks.css

custom-jet-blocks.css

116 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

119 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

120 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

120 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

126 ms

jet-tabs-frontend.css

jet-tabs-frontend.css

131 ms

global.css

global.css

145 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

140 ms

e-animation-grow.min.css

e-animation-grow.min.css

140 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

142 ms

post-22.css

post-22.css

150 ms

post-2287.css

post-2287.css

152 ms

chosen.min.css

chosen.min.css

160 ms

jet-search.css

jet-search.css

162 ms

css

css

40 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

189 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

174 ms

js

js

81 ms

js

js

137 ms

api.js

api.js

46 ms

js

js

148 ms

post-1241.css

post-1241.css

171 ms

post-1245.css

post-1245.css

154 ms

widget-video.min.css

widget-video.min.css

145 ms

post-2919.css

post-2919.css

143 ms

post-3270.css

post-3270.css

147 ms

widget-forms.min.css

widget-forms.min.css

157 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

139 ms

post-3424.css

post-3424.css

133 ms

post-3438.css

post-3438.css

127 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

130 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

211 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

208 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

202 ms

jet-plugins.js

jet-plugins.js

198 ms

jet-search.js

jet-search.js

198 ms

tulmar.js

tulmar.js

194 ms

theme-script.js

theme-script.js

194 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

194 ms

jet-popup-frontend.js

jet-popup-frontend.js

186 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

185 ms

vue.min.js

vue.min.js

180 ms

jet-menu-public-scripts.js

jet-menu-public-scripts.js

177 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

178 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

176 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

171 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

166 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

158 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

158 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

157 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

153 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

168 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

166 ms

jet-elements.min.js

jet-elements.min.js

160 ms

jet-popup-elementor-frontend.js

jet-popup-elementor-frontend.js

146 ms

jet-tabs-frontend.min.js

jet-tabs-frontend.min.js

146 ms

jet-blocks.min.js

jet-blocks.min.js

145 ms

widgets-scripts.js

widgets-scripts.js

147 ms

Landing-Markets-img.jpg

Landing-Markets-img.jpg

142 ms

LogoLanding.svg

LogoLanding.svg

123 ms

cover-defence-landing.jpg

cover-defence-landing.jpg

133 ms

cover-aviation-landing.jpg

cover-aviation-landing.jpg

132 ms

cover-civil-safety-landing.jpg

cover-civil-safety-landing.jpg

133 ms

tulmar.svg

tulmar.svg

132 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

58 ms

font

font

51 ms

font

font

98 ms

font

font

105 ms

font

font

106 ms

Accessibility Review

tulmar.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tulmar.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tulmar.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tulmar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tulmar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tulmar.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tulmar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: